2007
DOI: 10.1094/pdis-91-4-0414
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Propamocarb Hydrochloride on Mycelial Growth, Sporulation, and Infection by Phytophthora nicotianae Isolates from Virginia Nurseries

Abstract: Propamocarb hydrochloride is a systemic fungicide commonly used for control of Phytophthora diseases of nursery crops. Here we report on the effect of this compound on different growth stages of Phytophthora nicotianae, a major pathogen of numerous herbaceous and some woody ornamental plants. A total of 71 isolates were assayed for sensitivity to propamocarb at two concentrations of 1.8 mg/ml (label rate) and 10 mg/ml using clarified V8 agar as a base medium. All isolates grew at 10 mg/ml with the most sensiti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
16
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The results were similar to those of Hu et al (2007) for Phytophthora nicotianae (EC 50 = 2.2-90.1 mg l -1 ). FRAC(b) (2011) states that propamocarb-hydrochloride, in terms of resistance, is a low to medium risk fungicide.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The results were similar to those of Hu et al (2007) for Phytophthora nicotianae (EC 50 = 2.2-90.1 mg l -1 ). FRAC(b) (2011) states that propamocarb-hydrochloride, in terms of resistance, is a low to medium risk fungicide.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…In vitro screening of isolates using a single concentration of mefenoxam has been the major approach for sensitivity evaluation in Phytophthora species (Ferrin & Kabashima, 1991; Timmer et al ., 1998; Parra & Ristaino, 2001; Taylor et al ., 2002; Jeffers et al ., 2004; Hwang & Benson, 2005). However, it has been known that in vitro screening of oomycete isolates may not accurately predict the sensitivity to chemicals under in vivo conditions (Bruck et al ., 1980; Joseph & Coffey, 1984; Moorman & Kim, 2004), including a previous study with propamocarb (Hu et al ., 2007). The inconsistency between in vitro and in vivo tests may be caused by various factors such as plant‐fungicide interactions, aggressiveness of isolates, cultivar susceptibility and methods of fungicide application.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…White Orbit). Seedlings were treated with mefenoxam then challenged with P. nicotianae as described previously (Hu et al ., 2007). A plastic container (9 cm in diameter and 4·5 cm deep) was used to hold a smaller Petri dish (6 cm in diameter) with a filter paper (Whatman #4) on its top.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To test whether this control strategy could also be applied to WBPHs, we used denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) to investigate the composition of WBPH YLS. We then investigated the abundance of two YLS species and WBPH survival in response to five fungicides that are often used to control plant pathogens [24][25][26][27][28]. These findings may guide the development of an effective management strategy against WBPH.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%