2005
DOI: 10.5194/adgeo-2-201-2005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of propagation conditions on radar beam-ground interaction: impact on data quality

Abstract: Abstract. A large part of the research in the radar meteorology is devoted to the evaluation of the radar data quality and to the radar data processing. Even when, a set of absolute quality indexes can be produced (like as ground clutter presence, beam blockage rate, distance from radar, etc.), the final product quality has to be determined as a function of the task and of all the processing steps. In this paper the emphasis lies on the estimate of the rainfall at the ground level taking extra care for the co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
24
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The correction for residual anaprop clutter is performed with the method of Alberoni et al (2001) modified by Fornasiero et al (2005). This method compares, for each range-bin, the reflectivity value at the dynamic elevation map with those observed at the successive elevation scans at the same location.…”
Section: Residual Anapropmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The correction for residual anaprop clutter is performed with the method of Alberoni et al (2001) modified by Fornasiero et al (2005). This method compares, for each range-bin, the reflectivity value at the dynamic elevation map with those observed at the successive elevation scans at the same location.…”
Section: Residual Anapropmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This map is built resuming different information: the static map of precipitation-free echoes, the beam blocking rates and the heights, relative to the ground, of the 3-dB beam lower limit. The last two parameters are obtained simulating the beam path through a multi-layer model (Fornasiero et al, 2005(Fornasiero et al, , 2006, where the refractivity gradient profile is retrieved from a linear weighted combination of the two nearest (in time) radiosoundings profile, collected by a station that is co-located with the radar. The resulting profile is then interpolated at vertical steps of 0.2 km.…”
Section: Dynamic Elevation Mapmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Having determined a set of quality indices, a total QI field describing overall data quality can be computed, most often by using a multiplicative scheme (e.g. Fornasiero et al, 2005;Germann et al, 2009;Ośródka et al, 2014).…”
Section: Quality Index Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are not many papers focused on quality characterization of such data. Fornasiero et al (2005) presented a scheme employed in ARPA Bologna (Italy) for quality evaluation of radar data both raw and processed. The scheme developed in Institute of Meteorology and Water Management in Poland (IMGW) in the frame of BALTRAD project was described by Ośródka et al (2010Ośródka et al ( , 2012.…”
Section: Quality Control Algorithms For Radar Reflectivity Volumesmentioning
confidence: 99%