2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2013.02.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of prone and supine positioning on gastric residuals in preterm infants: A time series with cross-over study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
70
0
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
2
70
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…15 Finally, Chen et al, in a randomized, time series with cross-over study of 33 premature infants found a lower GR volume when infants were positioned prone. 16 However, in these studies, the volume of gastric contents remaining in the stomach was not verified making it unclear whether body position influenced gastric emptying or affected whether tube holes were more likely to be positioned in the pool of gastric fluid.…”
Section: Gastric Residuals As An Indicator Of Gastric Contentsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…15 Finally, Chen et al, in a randomized, time series with cross-over study of 33 premature infants found a lower GR volume when infants were positioned prone. 16 However, in these studies, the volume of gastric contents remaining in the stomach was not verified making it unclear whether body position influenced gastric emptying or affected whether tube holes were more likely to be positioned in the pool of gastric fluid.…”
Section: Gastric Residuals As An Indicator Of Gastric Contentsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…1,2 Decreased gastric residual and improved feeding tolerance have also been observed when preterm infants are positioned prone after feeding. 3 In addition, improved sleep state and decreased stress behaviors have been reported in neonates placed prone. 4 On the other hand, prone positioning is also associated with some adverse effects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 1 shows the articles used for extraction of the risk factors for neonatal safety during C-section. [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32] jaundice due to delayed cord clamping [22,25,33] nosocomial infection [3,[34][35][36][37][38] hypothermia and hyperthermia [9,39,40] Fall [9,10] safe sleep [9,[41][42][43][44] medication error [3,45] perioperative damage [3] error in registering infants' identity [8,46] Discussion Timely Cord Clamping…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%