2022
DOI: 10.1186/s13054-022-03897-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of prone and lateral positioning alternate in high-flow nasal cannula patients with severe COVID-19

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
2
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The novelty of our study is the finding that the COVID-19 patients presenting with acute respiratory failure and undergoing the lateral approach for hip fracture, showed a better level of oxygenation when compared to the patients treated with the direct anterior approach (the pre-operative and day one post-operative P/F in the group A were 273.16 vs. 279.69, while the P/F in the group B were 301.56 vs. 226.72, p < 0.05, respectively, Table 7 ), despite the fact that the mortality of the COVID-19 patients remains high, due to the different immune-response and other independent factors related to the infection per se. These results are in line with the previous findings on improving oxygenation in lateral and prone positions [ 22 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 ]. Indeed, the previous data on COVID-19 patients showed that the acute respiratory failure COVID-19 patients responded well to proning and/or alternative body position [ 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 ], for several reasons arising from: (1) the redistribution of the ventilation to perfusion mismatch, due to the gravity-induced increase of the blood flow to the spared regions of the lung, which thus become better ventilated; and (2) the improved P/F ratio, due to the lung recruitment of previously dependent lung regions, that ameliorates the hypoxemic vasoconstriction, reducing the pulmonary vascular resistance and improving the right ventricular function.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The novelty of our study is the finding that the COVID-19 patients presenting with acute respiratory failure and undergoing the lateral approach for hip fracture, showed a better level of oxygenation when compared to the patients treated with the direct anterior approach (the pre-operative and day one post-operative P/F in the group A were 273.16 vs. 279.69, while the P/F in the group B were 301.56 vs. 226.72, p < 0.05, respectively, Table 7 ), despite the fact that the mortality of the COVID-19 patients remains high, due to the different immune-response and other independent factors related to the infection per se. These results are in line with the previous findings on improving oxygenation in lateral and prone positions [ 22 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 ]. Indeed, the previous data on COVID-19 patients showed that the acute respiratory failure COVID-19 patients responded well to proning and/or alternative body position [ 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 ], for several reasons arising from: (1) the redistribution of the ventilation to perfusion mismatch, due to the gravity-induced increase of the blood flow to the spared regions of the lung, which thus become better ventilated; and (2) the improved P/F ratio, due to the lung recruitment of previously dependent lung regions, that ameliorates the hypoxemic vasoconstriction, reducing the pulmonary vascular resistance and improving the right ventricular function.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…These results are in line with the previous findings on improving oxygenation in lateral and prone positions [ 22 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 ]. Indeed, the previous data on COVID-19 patients showed that the acute respiratory failure COVID-19 patients responded well to proning and/or alternative body position [ 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 ], for several reasons arising from: (1) the redistribution of the ventilation to perfusion mismatch, due to the gravity-induced increase of the blood flow to the spared regions of the lung, which thus become better ventilated; and (2) the improved P/F ratio, due to the lung recruitment of previously dependent lung regions, that ameliorates the hypoxemic vasoconstriction, reducing the pulmonary vascular resistance and improving the right ventricular function. The need for surgery should exactly match the need for ventilator management of those patients, in order to avoid an increased risk of worsening the clinical condition after surgery and the need for high observation or a bed in ICU, given the lack of resources during the pandemic.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…While early in the pandemic there was a practice of early intubation, as the pandemic evolved multiple non-invasive forms of pulmonary support was increasing used, including high flow nasal cannula and prone positioning in attempts to avoid intubation. 100,101 This topic of avoiding harmful therapies is critical as there are certain therapies that have never been shown to provide benefit in COVID-19 and are only associated with wasted opportunity costs or harm and many therapies that provide benefit during the Early Viral Upper Respiratory Nonhypoxic Phase but provide only minimal benefit, no benefit or can cause harm if given during the Early Inflammatory Lower Respiratory Hypoxic Phase. Remdesivir is an example of a therapeutic agent with great efficacy when given early but with mixed results when given after the period of viral replication and the onset of the Early Inflammatory Lower Respiratory Hypoxic Phase.…”
Section: Early Inflammatory Lower Respiratory Hypoxic Phasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, we need to discuss the effect of HFNC according to changes in posture during ERCP procedure, such as lateral or prone positioning. Awake prone positioning in patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure due to COVID-19 treated with HFNC improved oxygen profiles and had preventable effect on the tracheal intubation or treatment failure [ 7 , 8 ]. Prone position may reduce ventilation to perfusion mismatch and intrapulmonary shunt and decrease respiratory rate.…”
Section: Replymentioning
confidence: 99%