2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2021.142108
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of process parameters, debinding and sintering on the microstructure of 316L stainless steel produced by binder jetting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
19
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
4
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Samples were produced by an Innovent Plus 3D printer machine (ExOne, North Huntingdon, PA, USA); process parameters are reported in Table 1. The process set-up was derived using the calibration procedure reported in Reference [27]. Interruptions to the printing process were required to realize minor maintenance operations and avoid major deviations in the printed components from the CAD files.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Samples were produced by an Innovent Plus 3D printer machine (ExOne, North Huntingdon, PA, USA); process parameters are reported in Table 1. The process set-up was derived using the calibration procedure reported in Reference [27]. Interruptions to the printing process were required to realize minor maintenance operations and avoid major deviations in the printed components from the CAD files.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The high intensity energy issues related to SEBM/SLM techniques are typically overcome by the binder jetting process, which applies the paradigms of the traditional 2D printing to the development of three-dimensional objects. In this process, the final object is obtained by a layer-by-layer selective deposition of a liquid binder onto a powder beds of precursors materials, such as ceramics (Lv et al, 2019), stainless steel (Mirzababaei and Pasebani, 2019;Lecis et al, 2021) and copper (Bai and Williams, 2015). Thanks to the powder-liquid interaction, the cross section of the object is produced; after the removal of excess powder, the final structure is obtained by thermal treatment, to remove the binder components and to sinter the metal framework (Ziaee and Crane, 2019).…”
Section: Additive Manufacturing Of Geometric Supportsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…in a single thermal cycle in a chamber furnace (Lenton UAF 14/27, CARBOLITE GERO, UK) to remove the organic material and consolidate the parts. The debinding conditions for PEG were adopted from previous studies [27] and were confirmed after thermogravimetric analyses (TGA Q500, TA Instruments, US) of granulated powders with PEI in the 0-600 • C range in air. The components were finally sintered at 1700 • C for 1 h (Route 1 -Electric furnace, ATN 30/18, Nannetti S.r.l., Italy) and, for A30I2L and B30I2S samples only, at 1750 • C for 3 h (Route 2).…”
Section: Printing and Densificationmentioning
confidence: 99%