2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.nedt.2013.02.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of problem-based learning vs. traditional lecture on Korean nursing students' critical thinking, problem-solving, and self-directed learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

11
137
0
9

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 184 publications
(171 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
11
137
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, the duration of the PBL application was only five weeks which is a very short time to affect styles of students. This was in line with Choi et al (2014) who found that there was no significant change in the study group who use PBL due to the short time that lasted for one semester (16 weeks). Furthermore, to have significant changes, the PBL programs should be applied for at least one year with students.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this study, the duration of the PBL application was only five weeks which is a very short time to affect styles of students. This was in line with Choi et al (2014) who found that there was no significant change in the study group who use PBL due to the short time that lasted for one semester (16 weeks). Furthermore, to have significant changes, the PBL programs should be applied for at least one year with students.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Furthermore, to have significant changes, the PBL programs should be applied for at least one year with students. [58] Besides, Lim et al (2010) found that there were no significant differences between the experimental group and control group in any of the decision making styles, as there was no sufficient time to affect decision making style. [59] In contrast, Baker et al (2007) suggested that PBL had an effect and could change the learning styles of nursing students.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…A student-active and problem based pedagogic approach is, in several previous studies, found to be fundamental to develop the students' clinical reasoning skills and to enhance their readiness for solving patient problems in clinical settings. [4,5,11,14,[19][20][21] A systematic meta-analysis of studies focusing on the effectiveness of PBL for development of nursing students' critical thinking conclude that the PBL students score significantly higher on critical thinking compared with students who had followed traditional lectures. [22] Similar results were found in Yoo and Park's [10] study, concluding that CBL was the most effective approach for graduate nurses' development of problem-solving abilities.…”
Section: Problem Based Versus Lecture Based Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there are many disadvantages of DIA. One of them is that it decreases students' problem-solving skills (Choi et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%