2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.09.441
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of primary and secondary metallization techniques on the performance of electric discharge machining (EDM) electrode produced by additive manufacturing and composite coating

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 44 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The coating of the aluminium in the electrode increases the material removal rate significantly; the coated electrode produces 24 % less TWR than the uncoated electrode does. Shaikh and Ahuja [9] conducted the experiments with electrodes, such as silver coated tungsten and electroless nickel coated electrodes, in the EDM process. They noted that the electroless nickel-coated electrode has a20 % higher machining rate than the silver-coated tool, which is because the electroless nickel coating increases the current distribution on the electrode.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The coating of the aluminium in the electrode increases the material removal rate significantly; the coated electrode produces 24 % less TWR than the uncoated electrode does. Shaikh and Ahuja [9] conducted the experiments with electrodes, such as silver coated tungsten and electroless nickel coated electrodes, in the EDM process. They noted that the electroless nickel-coated electrode has a20 % higher machining rate than the silver-coated tool, which is because the electroless nickel coating increases the current distribution on the electrode.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%