1982
DOI: 10.1016/0198-0149(82)90009-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of pressure and pressure acclimation on activity and oxygen consumption in the bathypelagic mysid Gnathophausia ingens

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The interference can affect cardiac function (Mickel & Childress, 1982 b ; Airriess & Childress, ), with clear implications for aerobic scope. Observed respiratory and cardiac responses to pressure change appear to support the application of the oxygen‐limitation hypothesis to hydrostatic pressure tolerance (George, ; Mickel & Childress, 1982 a ; Robinson, Thatje & Osseforth, ; Brown & Thatje, ; Thatje & Robinson, ), with further consistent indications that voluntary movement and feeding are affected by hyperbaric conditions beyond optimum (Thatje et al , ; Thatje & Robinson, ). Aerobic scope certainly appears the crucial factor setting tolerance limits (Peck et al , , , ; Pörtner, ; Pörtner et al , , ; Brown & Thatje, ; Thatje & Robinson, ).…”
Section: Physiological Limitation By Low Temperature and High Hydrostmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…The interference can affect cardiac function (Mickel & Childress, 1982 b ; Airriess & Childress, ), with clear implications for aerobic scope. Observed respiratory and cardiac responses to pressure change appear to support the application of the oxygen‐limitation hypothesis to hydrostatic pressure tolerance (George, ; Mickel & Childress, 1982 a ; Robinson, Thatje & Osseforth, ; Brown & Thatje, ; Thatje & Robinson, ), with further consistent indications that voluntary movement and feeding are affected by hyperbaric conditions beyond optimum (Thatje et al , ; Thatje & Robinson, ). Aerobic scope certainly appears the crucial factor setting tolerance limits (Peck et al , , , ; Pörtner, ; Pörtner et al , , ; Brown & Thatje, ; Thatje & Robinson, ).…”
Section: Physiological Limitation By Low Temperature and High Hydrostmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…It is well known that deep-living pelagic fish and crus taceans have metabolic rates considerably lower than those of shallower-living pelagic species (Childress, 1969(Childress, , 1971b(Childress, , 1975(Childress, , 1977Smith and Hessler, 1974;Torres et al, 1979;Smith, 1978;Smith and Laver, 1981;Cowles, 1987). This reduction is of an order of magnitude or more, and can be only partially accounted for by changes in temperature, pressure, and animal protein content with depth (Childress, 1975;Mickel and Childress, 1982). Lower metabolic rates at depth have generally been attributed to selection for energy conservation due Received 30 October 1987;accepted 31 May 1988. to food limitation at depth Nygaard, 1973, 1974;Bailey and Robison, 1986).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, studies on a variety of vertically migrating and deeper living pelagic species have indicated that temperature is usually the more critical factor and that these animals show little response of metabolic rates to pressures within the species' normal ranges (Teal 197 1;Smith and Teal 1973;Belman and Gordon 1979;Torres and Childress 1983). In some cases, midwater species do seem to vary their activity and metabolic rates as a function of pressure (Teal 197 1;Childress 1977a;Mickel and Childress 1982); however, the effects do not appear to be typical of most species and are usually modest in magnitude. These previous studies of pressure effects on metabolic rates have been concerned with only three (fishes, crustaceans, and molluscs) of the many important groups of mid-water animals.…”
Section: Acknowledgmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%