2009
DOI: 10.1097/jom.0b013e3181a297b5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Presenteeism in Chronic Occupational Musculoskeletal Disorders: Stay at Work is Validated

Abstract: Both employees and employers will benefit if the ill or injured employee stays at work postinjury in lieu of short- or long-term disability.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
34
0
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(16 reference statements)
3
34
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Although presenteeism was one of the search terms in this review, all studies reporting on presenteeism in CMP were excluded because the subjects in these studies had significant sick leave and therefore did not satisfy the inclusion criteria for this review. Literature on presenteeism does indicate that production loss caused by presenteeism could exceed production loss caused by absenteeism [5,27,68]. It is possible that people who stay at work have low work productivity: SAW does not automatically mean work participation with sustained productive capacity.…”
Section: Strengths and Limitations Of The Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Although presenteeism was one of the search terms in this review, all studies reporting on presenteeism in CMP were excluded because the subjects in these studies had significant sick leave and therefore did not satisfy the inclusion criteria for this review. Literature on presenteeism does indicate that production loss caused by presenteeism could exceed production loss caused by absenteeism [5,27,68]. It is possible that people who stay at work have low work productivity: SAW does not automatically mean work participation with sustained productive capacity.…”
Section: Strengths and Limitations Of The Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Secondly, in our review, we defined SAW as sustained work participation despite CMP for at least 12 months, without present sick leave. Two studies were excluded because the defined working group was sick listed considerably and therefore did not satisfy this criterion [27,66]. We also included studies with negative work-related outcome measures, such as work loss or incapacity [48,50].…”
Section: Strengths and Limitations Of The Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…W ten sposób można bowiem uniknąć błędu utożsamiania zjawiska obecności w pracy mimo choroby z jego skutkiem (dodajmy, że jednym z wielu możliwych) w postaci obniżenia poziomu produktywności. Warto zauważyć, że obecność w pracy mimo choroby czy problemów zdrowotnych może mieć rów-nież pozytywne skutki [8]. Nieuprawniona wydaje się więc nadmierna pejoratywizacja prezentyzmu poprzez ograniczanie go do obniżenia produktywności.…”
unclassified