2012
DOI: 10.14742/ajet.887
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of presentation mode on mobile language learning: A performance efficiency perspective

Abstract: This study investigated the effects of simultaneous written text on the comprehension of spoken English as a foreign language, when the text is presented with the aid of a personal digital assistant (PDA) as a learning tool. Eighty-seven university students majoring in applied foreign languages were randomly assigned to either listening with auditory materials only, or listening with identical and concurrent written text. Performance efficiency was used to provide a better indicator of the quality of learning.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…So a smartphone can be said to be inferior to a laptop only in terms of screen size. However, this also seems to be a temporary problem, as smartphone producers offer larger screen sizes (Chen et al , ) and better resolutions (Nordin et al , ), or LED projectors and touch screen facilities (Wang & Shen, ). Thanks to all these features, smartphones are regarded as one of the most appropriate devices for m‐learning (Yılmaz, ) and possibly increase interest in mobile learning systems (Wu et al , ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…So a smartphone can be said to be inferior to a laptop only in terms of screen size. However, this also seems to be a temporary problem, as smartphone producers offer larger screen sizes (Chen et al , ) and better resolutions (Nordin et al , ), or LED projectors and touch screen facilities (Wang & Shen, ). Thanks to all these features, smartphones are regarded as one of the most appropriate devices for m‐learning (Yılmaz, ) and possibly increase interest in mobile learning systems (Wu et al , ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To illustrate, the review by Wu et al (2012) suggests that most mobile learning studies (86% of 164) present positive outcomes. Not only studies based on the views of teachers (Uzunboylu & Özdamlı, 2011) or students (Chen, Chang & Yen, 2012;Cheon et al, 2012;Gedik, Hancı-Karademirci, Kurşun & Çagıltay, 2012;Menkhoff & Bengtsson, 2012) but also experimental works (Geist, 2011;Shih, Chuang & Hwang, 2010) have found that m-tools including m-phones improve learning. Exceptionally, Kinash et al (2012) reported that undergraduate students were mostly neutral when asked about learning improvement via mobile learning (using iPads).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[13] Another study on using mobile devices in ESL learning "revealed that for learners with lower English levels, the presence of concurrent written text elicited higher performance efficiency in the immediate recall task of the English listening comprehension." [14] A smaller scale study looked into using mobile phone to produce a weekly 30-second video on a selected topic as part of a language learning tool. In the video performances, the participants suggested that this was an effective learning process that could increase the number of words they spoke in monologue.…”
Section: Mobile Assisted Language Learning (Mall)/eslmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mobile learning (m-learning) is a new, promising field (Trifonova & Ronchetti, 2003) that refers to the use of mobile technologies for educational purposes (Chen, Chang, & Yen, 2012). Learning with mobile devices is highly contextualized and experiential within specific domains (Kukulska-Hulme & Traxler, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%