2001
DOI: 10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(01)74649-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Prepartum Dry Matter Intake and Forage Percentage on Postpartum Performance of Lactating Dairy Cows

Abstract: The objective of this research was to determine whether different dry matter intakes (DMI) or forage percentages prepartum would have an impact on postpartum performance. Multiparous Holstein cows (n = 41) received either high (H) or low (L) forage rations that were fed free choice (F) or restricted (R), i.e., HF, HR, LF, and LR. The L rations were higher in net energy of lactation and lower in neutral detergent fiber concentrations. After calving, all cows were fed the same ration ad libitum. Prepartum DMI we… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

28
97
3
3

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(131 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
28
97
3
3
Order By: Relevance
“…I). Furthermore, in those experiments where the average level of dry period intake has been successfully increased, there is still a subsequent dip in intake in the days immediately prior to calving which is often more pronounced for the high energy fed cows such that at calving their intake is the same as that of lower energy fed controls [55,57]. This strongly suggests that the dip in intake, and the concomitant body mobilisation, is not due to poor feeding management.…”
Section: Strategies To Decrease Body Mobilisationmentioning
confidence: 56%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…I). Furthermore, in those experiments where the average level of dry period intake has been successfully increased, there is still a subsequent dip in intake in the days immediately prior to calving which is often more pronounced for the high energy fed cows such that at calving their intake is the same as that of lower energy fed controls [55,57]. This strongly suggests that the dip in intake, and the concomitant body mobilisation, is not due to poor feeding management.…”
Section: Strategies To Decrease Body Mobilisationmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…A summary of the reported effects of high starch feeding on NEFA concentrations in blood and liver is shown in Table I. Some studies with high starch prepartum feeds have found lower levels of NEFA in blood after calving when compared to low starch controls [57,70,81]. Others have found no effect [22,105,115].…”
Section: Strategies To Decrease Body Mobilisationmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These two feeding strategies have been compared in a number of experiments but have often failed to show significant effects on metabolic indicators of fat and liver -E-mail: nicolas.friggens@agroparistech.dk metabolism post-calving. Offering a high-energy-density diet (H) in the dry period has, in some studies, increased non-esterified fatty acids (NEFA) post-calving, compared to a low-energy-density diet (L) (Rukkwamsuk et al, 1998;Holtenius et al, 2003), but most studies have found no effect (Minor et al, 1998;Tesfa et al, 1999;Holcomb et al, 2001;Doepel et al, 2002;Rabelo et al, 2005;Dann et al, 2006). Different results have also been reported for liver lipid/triacylglycerol (TAG) where one study has shown a decreased content post-calving for cows offered an H diet in the dry period compared to an L diet (Doepel et al, 2002), others the opposite (Rukkwamsuk et al, 1998;Douglas et al, 2006), whereas others again have found no effect (Grum et al, 1996;Tesfa et al, 1999;Rabelo et al, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Roche (2007) suggested that discrepancies in milk production responses may relate to differences in the level of feeding adopted after calving, but his data showed interaction effects between pre-and post-partum feeding level only for blood analysis and not for milk production. Several studies have reported increased milk fat concentration in responses to additional pre-partum energy (Lodge et al, 1975;Holcomb et al, 2001;McNamara et al, 2003a), though others did not (Garnsworthy and Topps, 1982;Dewhurst et al, 2000b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%