2001
DOI: 10.1007/bf03033234
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of prenatal exposure to cocaine on the developing brain: Anatomical, chemical, physiological and behavioral consequences

Abstract: Earlier studies of human infants and studies employing animal models had indicated that prenatal exposure to cocaine produced developmental changes in the behavior of the offspring. The present paper reports on the results obtained in a rabbit model of in utero exposure to cocaine using intravenous injections (4 mg/kg, twice daily) that mimic the pharmacokinetics of crack cocaine in humans. At this dose, cocaine had no effect on the body weight gain of dams, time to delivery, litter size and body weight or oth… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
21
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 139 publications
2
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cocaine exposure in utero results in molecular and cellular changes in several brain areas known to be involved in memory and attention, such as caudate nucleus (Harvey et al, 2001), prefrontal cortex (Morrow et al, 2002(Morrow et al, , 2007, and hippocampus (Little and Teyler, 1996;Harvey et al, 2001;Morrow et al, 2002Morrow et al, , 2007. For example, cocaine exposure in utero results in anatomical changes in the prefrontal cortex of postnatal rats, including a loss of inhibitory projections from parvalbumin-containing GABAergic local circuit neurons to prelimbic pyramidal neurons (Morrow et al, 2005), deficient inhibitory axoaxonic synapses on pyramidal cells (Morrow et al, 2003), and an increased number of spine synapses (Morrow et al, 2007).…”
Section: Molecular and Cellular Changes Caused By In Utero Cocaine Exmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cocaine exposure in utero results in molecular and cellular changes in several brain areas known to be involved in memory and attention, such as caudate nucleus (Harvey et al, 2001), prefrontal cortex (Morrow et al, 2002(Morrow et al, , 2007, and hippocampus (Little and Teyler, 1996;Harvey et al, 2001;Morrow et al, 2002Morrow et al, , 2007. For example, cocaine exposure in utero results in anatomical changes in the prefrontal cortex of postnatal rats, including a loss of inhibitory projections from parvalbumin-containing GABAergic local circuit neurons to prelimbic pyramidal neurons (Morrow et al, 2005), deficient inhibitory axoaxonic synapses on pyramidal cells (Morrow et al, 2003), and an increased number of spine synapses (Morrow et al, 2007).…”
Section: Molecular and Cellular Changes Caused By In Utero Cocaine Exmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cocaine has been shown to act on G proteins and on signalling cascades in NAc, PFC and DStr (82)(83)(84) and G proteins have been implicated in the effects of prenatal exposure to cocaine (85). Downstream in the cascade, DA and cAMP-regulated phosphoprotein, Mr 32 kDa (DARPP-32) has been identified as a major target for DA and protein kinase A (PKA) and recently, the regulation of the specific state of DARPP-32 phosphorylation has provided an integrated mechanism for the study of dopaminoceptive neurons; both cocaine and caffeine act via DARPP-32 (cf 86 for review).…”
Section: Changes In Neurochemicals and Behavior After Ketanserin Cocmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Out of the 35 chemicals listed in Table 2, references for changes in axonal or dendritic outgrowth after in vivo exposure were noted for only four. Changes in axonal or dendritic morphology have been observed after developmental exposure to the neurotoxicants lead (Alfano and Petit, 1982;Campbell et al, 1982;Reuhl et al, 1989), ethanol (Burrows et al, 1995;Granato and Van Pelt, 2003;Smith and Davies, 1990), cocaine (Harvey et al, 2001;Stanwood et al, 2001) and methyl mercury (Choi et al, 1981;Stoltenburg-Didinger and Markwort, 1990). While it would be desirable to increase the data set to better understand the relationship between chemical effects on neurite outgrowth in vitro and in vivo, a one-to-one correspondence may not be necessary in the context of chemical screening.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%