1997
DOI: 10.1097/00000374-199708000-00016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Prenatal and Early Postnatal Ethanol Exposure on [H]MK-801 Binding in Rat Cortex and Hippocampus

Abstract: The effects of prenatal and/or early postnatal exposure to ethanol at high concentrations on N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor number and functioning in the weanling rat were examined. The binge-like exposure protocol was used in an animal model of acute ethanol effects at two critical periods of development. [3H]MK-801 binding parameters for the internal channel phencyclidine site were assessed in the presence of 10 microM glutamate and 10 microM glycine activation. Four treatment groups were included: (1)… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…CPP application completely blocked LTP induction following PNEE, suggesting that prenatal ethanol exposure causes LTP to become solely reliant upon NMDARs. This is surprising because PNEE reduces [ 3 H]MK-801 binding, NMDARmediated calcium entry, and expression of NR2A and NR2B NMDAR subunits in males (Lee et al, 1994;Diaz-Granados et al, 1997;Spuhler-Phillips et al, 1997) and activation of intracellular pathways that contribute to LTP (Samudio-Ruiz et al, 2009). Prenatal stress can also reduce NMDAR subunit expression in the hippocampus (Son et al, 2006;Yaka et al, 2007) indicating that altered expression and/or function of NMDARs following prenatal ethanol or prenatal stress might affect NMDAR contribution to synaptic plasticity in the adolescent hippocampus.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CPP application completely blocked LTP induction following PNEE, suggesting that prenatal ethanol exposure causes LTP to become solely reliant upon NMDARs. This is surprising because PNEE reduces [ 3 H]MK-801 binding, NMDARmediated calcium entry, and expression of NR2A and NR2B NMDAR subunits in males (Lee et al, 1994;Diaz-Granados et al, 1997;Spuhler-Phillips et al, 1997) and activation of intracellular pathways that contribute to LTP (Samudio-Ruiz et al, 2009). Prenatal stress can also reduce NMDAR subunit expression in the hippocampus (Son et al, 2006;Yaka et al, 2007) indicating that altered expression and/or function of NMDARs following prenatal ethanol or prenatal stress might affect NMDAR contribution to synaptic plasticity in the adolescent hippocampus.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, although Snell and colleagues (1993) observed an increased number of [ 3 H]MK-801and [ 3 H]glutamate binding sites to brain membranes in ethanol-treated mice, they found no difference in the binding characteristics for either [ 3 H]glycine or competitive NMDA receptor antagonist [ 3 H]CGS 19755. Furthermore, several researchers have not been able to detect any changes in the number of [ 3 H]MK-801 binding sites even following extensive periods of in vivo ethanol treatment (Tremwel et al 1994;Carter et al 1995;Diaz-Granados et al 1997;Rudolph et al 1997). These controversies are extended to corresponding ligand binding data from the brains of human alcoholics (Michaelis et al 1990;Freund and Anderson 1996).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in the same animal model for ethanol dependence, Snell and colleagues (1993) observed no changes in the binding parameters of the NMDA receptor co-agonist, [ 3 H]glycine, or the competitive NMDA receptor antagonist, [ 3 H]CGS19755. Other researchers, using various chronic ethanol administration regimens in vivo, have generally failed to observe changes in the binding parameters of NMDA receptor ligands (Tremwel et al 1994;Carter et al 1995;Ulrichsen et al 1996;Diaz-Granados et al 1997;Rudolph et al 1997). Similarly, in vitro studies in neuronal cultures have also provided conflicting observations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A decreased number of NMDAR binding sites has been detected in hippocampal preparations from the rat and guinea pig (Abdollah and Brien, 1995;Savage et al, 1991). Region-specific alterations in the binding of the noncompetitive NMDAR antagonist [ 3 H]MK-801 have been observed in the brain of the rat and guinea pig exposed to ethanol prenatally, postnatally, or both (Chiu et al, 1999;Diaz-Granados et al, 1997;Naassila and Daoust, 2002). Modifications in the developmental patterns of NMDAR subunit messenger RNA and protein content have been documented in several studies (Hughes et al, 1998;Naassila and Daoust, 2002;Spuhler-Phillips et al, 1997).…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%