2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.livsci.2007.01.100
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of pregelatinized vs. native potato starch on intestinal weight and stomach lesions of pigs housed in barren pens or on straw bedding

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present study, microbial production of SCFA was not quantified, but an increase in fermentation activity, and thereby an increase in SCFA production (Haenen et al, 2013;Souza da Silva et al, 2014) could be confirmed by adaptations found in the gastrointestinal tract of pigs fed diets with RS. The empty weight of the colon and total gastrointestinal tract were greater in pigs fed diets with RS than in pigs fed diets without RS, in line with previous studies (Martinez-Puig et al, 2003;Bolhuis et al, 2007).…”
supporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the present study, microbial production of SCFA was not quantified, but an increase in fermentation activity, and thereby an increase in SCFA production (Haenen et al, 2013;Souza da Silva et al, 2014) could be confirmed by adaptations found in the gastrointestinal tract of pigs fed diets with RS. The empty weight of the colon and total gastrointestinal tract were greater in pigs fed diets with RS than in pigs fed diets without RS, in line with previous studies (Martinez-Puig et al, 2003;Bolhuis et al, 2007).…”
supporting
confidence: 90%
“…Contrary to pigs fed ALG-containing diets, pigs fed RS-containing diets enhanced efficiency in the use of DE. Although carcass growth was reduced, colon and total gastrointestinal tract empty weight were heavier in pigs fed diets with RS, reflecting increased stimulation of fermentation in the gastrointestinal tract (Bolhuis et al, 2007). Moreover, it is also remarkable that the carcass gain : DE intake ratio was not affected by RS.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Bertrand et al, 2011), which in turn changes intestinal motility and transit (Kemperman et al, 2007), and thereby potentially affects satiety (Sleeth et al, 2010). Intestinal motility could be reduced in RS-fed pigs, possibly leading to a reduced passage rate of digesta in the colon, in line with a previous study demonstrating increased full weights of the caecum and colon in pigs fed native potato starch (Bolhuis et al, 2007). It should be noted though that the relationship between intestinal 5-HT release and motility is not always in the same direction (see Bertrand et al, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…Moreover, both diets increased the relative empty weight of the colon, but only RS increased the weight of the total gastrointestinal tract. This is conceivably the result of an increase in bacterial mass and fermentation end-products [ 24 ] or an increase in metabolically active tissue in the colon [ 12 , 25 ]. The gut microbiota plays an important role in host physiology [ 26 ], and a different impact on community composition resulting from ingestion of these dietary fibers is therefore expected to occur due to their different physicochemical and metabolic properties.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%