2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2004.11.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of preceding birth intervals on neonatal, infant and under‐five years mortality and nutritional status in developing countries: evidence from the demographic and health surveys

Abstract: Considering both the increased risk of mortality and undernutrition for a birth earlier than 36 months and the great number of births that occur with such short intervals, the author recommends that mothers space births at least 36 months. However, the tendency for increased risk of neonatal mortality for births with intervals of 60 or more months leads the author to conclude that the optimal birth interval is between 36 and 59 months. This information can be used by health care providers to counsel women on t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

44
487
4
10

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 559 publications
(565 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
44
487
4
10
Order By: Relevance
“…Third, once birth intervals exceed 47 months, the mortality‐reducing effect begins to turn upward. This result, shown in previous research, led to the WHO recommendation of spacing children about three years apart (Rutstein 2005). Having established that Bangladesh's population, on average, fits to the expected patterns of birth spacing on child mortality, I now investigate heterogeneity in this relationship.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Third, once birth intervals exceed 47 months, the mortality‐reducing effect begins to turn upward. This result, shown in previous research, led to the WHO recommendation of spacing children about three years apart (Rutstein 2005). Having established that Bangladesh's population, on average, fits to the expected patterns of birth spacing on child mortality, I now investigate heterogeneity in this relationship.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…A consistent negative relationship between birth interval length and infant mortality risks has been identified in a wide variety of contexts (Cleland and Sathar 1984; Hobcraft, McDonald, and Rutstein 1985; Palloni and Millman 1986; Millman and Cooksey 1987; Pebley, Hermalin, and Knodel 1991; Boerma and Bicego 1992; Curtis, Diamond, and McDonald 1993; Rutstein 2005; Kozuki and Walker 2013; Mahande and Obure 2016; Molitoris 2017). The ubiquity of this relationship has led the World Health Organization to recommend that mothers in developing countries space their births at least three years apart (WHO 2007), and this recommendation has been implemented in community‐based family planning programs (Ahmed et al.…”
mentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Short-term breastfeeding, and especially no breastfeeding is associated with shorter birth interval (Rutstein 2005). An increase in breast cancer risk has been reported among premenopausal American women, who nursed their first (RR ¼ 1.37) or second (RR ¼ 1,44) child o1 month (Byers et al, 1985).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shorter birth intervals of less than 12 months have been reported in earlier literature as a strong predictor of poor infant feeding (20)(21)(22)(23)(24) . This could be related to maternal depletion syndrome and resource competition between siblings, in addition to a lack of care and attention experienced by first-born infants (25)(26)(27)(28) .…”
Section: Complementary Feeding Indicatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%