2000
DOI: 10.1095/biolreprod63.3.677
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Preactivation of Ooplasts or Synchronization of Blastomere Nuclei in G1 on Preimplantation Development of Rabbit Serial Nuclear Transfer Embryos1

Abstract: Blastomeres from eight-cell-stage rabbit embryos have been fused with enucleated metaphase II oocytes (ooplasts) or with ooplasts that were preactivated before fusion. Preactivation of ooplasts before nuclear transfer (NT) raises the rate of preimplantation development from 15% to 56%, which remains elevated in the next series of NT (48.6% and 47.2% in the second and third rounds, respectively). Transfer of eight-cell embryos from the third round to the recipient resulted in the birth of normal young. Synchron… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our current NT procedures apparently do not reprogram the differentiated, somatic nuclei of fetal fibroblasts; therefore, NT with donor cells expressing, for example, green fluorescence protein driven by exogenous or endogenous preimplantation, embryo-specific promoters could be useful in allowing assessment of embryonic genome activation [36]. Parenthetically, preactivation of the cytoplast was beneficial for the unsynchronized embryonic cell NT embryos in this study (Table 4), which is in agreement with previous results in monkeys [20], cattle [4,26], and rabbits [37]. We show here a high blastocyst formation rate based on a significant number of NT embryos (n ϭ 240) derived from 8-to 16-cell stage blastomeres.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Our current NT procedures apparently do not reprogram the differentiated, somatic nuclei of fetal fibroblasts; therefore, NT with donor cells expressing, for example, green fluorescence protein driven by exogenous or endogenous preimplantation, embryo-specific promoters could be useful in allowing assessment of embryonic genome activation [36]. Parenthetically, preactivation of the cytoplast was beneficial for the unsynchronized embryonic cell NT embryos in this study (Table 4), which is in agreement with previous results in monkeys [20], cattle [4,26], and rabbits [37]. We show here a high blastocyst formation rate based on a significant number of NT embryos (n ϭ 240) derived from 8-to 16-cell stage blastomeres.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…After blind enucleation (Yang et al, 1992;Piotrowska et al, 2000), the oocytes were transferred with a Pasteur pipette to the drop of medium containing nuclear donor cells. A sufficient number of donor cells was added to another drop of B-Ham's without CCB in the same micromanipulation plate.…”
Section: Nuclear Transfermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As mentioned, so synchronized cell populations become less synchronous after progression through G 1 . Furthermore, undesirable effects such as cytotoxicity and growth imbalance are seen during arrest in mitosis (2628). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%