Effects of Pre-Harvest Glyphosate Application on Spring Wheat Quality Characteristics

Malalgoda, Maneka; Ohm, Jae‐Bom; Ransom, Joel K.; Howatt, Kirk; Şimşek, Şenay

doi:10.3390/agriculture10040111

Cited by 11 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 51 publications

(67 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…An intriguing observation in the current study is that there is lack of significant difference in test weight between the treatments, especially considering there was a significant difference in groat plumpness, which is often correlated with test weight (Ames et al., 2014). Recent research on the effect of glyphosate on spring wheat quality showed that kernel weight decreased significantly when glyphosate was applied prior to physiological maturity (Malalgoda, Ohm, Ransom, Howatt, et al., 2020). Additionally, significant differences in test weight in wheat were observed when glyphosate was applied at the soft dough stage (Manthey et al., 2004).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Impact of glyphosate applied preharvest on oat kernel quality

et al. 2021

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background and objectives Preharvest glyphosate is applied to oats for weed control and as a desiccant. The effect of glyphosate applied at various stages of oat physiological maturity on oat end product quality has not been reported previously. In this study, the effects of glyphosate application at two separate stages of physiological maturity on oat groat quality and rolled oats quality were determined. Findings Oat was grown at two locations. Glyphosate was applied at the soft dough, physiological maturity stages, or not applied. Effect of preharvest glyphosate application at the oat soft dough stage on groat hardness, groat percentage (0.7%–3.7% decrease by cultivar), and percent plump groats (0.3%–6.1% decrease by cultivar), when compared to untreated oats, was noticeable. However, glyphosate applied at physiological maturity (manufacturer's recommendation) did not detrimentally affect groat starch (average 60.3%) or end product quality. Conclusions Therefore, from an end‐user perspective, applying glyphosate preharvest at oat physiological maturity does not impact oat quality. Significance and novelty Glyphosate when applied preharvest to oats can control weed and facilitate harvest, a boon to farmers. Final oat quality, a decisive factor for commercial processor use, was not detrimentally affected when glyphosate was applied at oat physiological maturity.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Impact of glyphosate applied preharvest on oat kernel quality

et al. 2021

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In addition, various biochemical characteristics influenced during germination cause poor product qualities of cereal crops. Pre-harvest glyphosate treatment may have an influence on the biochemical and nutritional features of wheat bran and proteins, perhaps by disrupting biochemical processes essential for starch and protein stacking, resulting in variations in seed quality attributes [ 64 ]. Even though the molecular foundation for the physiological impacts is recognized, the genes associated with pre-harvest sprouting are less understood.…”

Section: Factors Affecting Seed Dormancy and Pre-harvest Sproutingmentioning

confidence: 99%

Seed Dormancy and Pre-Harvest Sprouting in Rice—An Updated Overview

Sohn

Subramanian

Thamilarasan

et al. 2021

IJMS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Pre-harvest sprouting is a critical phenomenon involving the germination of seeds in the mother plant before harvest under relative humid conditions and reduced dormancy. As it results in reduced grain yield and quality, it is a common problem for the farmers who have cultivated the rice and wheat across the globe. Crop yields need to be steadily increased to improve the people’s ability to adapt to risks as the world’s population grows and natural disasters become more frequent. To improve the quality of grain and to avoid pre-harvest sprouting, a clear understanding of the crops should be known with the use of molecular omics approaches. Meanwhile, pre-harvest sprouting is a complicated phenomenon, especially in rice, and physiological, hormonal, and genetic changes should be monitored, which can be modified by high-throughput metabolic engineering techniques. The integration of these data allows the creation of tailored breeding lines suitable for various demands and regions, and it is crucial for increasing the crop yields and economic benefits. In this review, we have provided an overview of seed dormancy and its regulation, the major causes of pre-harvest sprouting, and also unraveled the novel avenues to battle pre-harvest sprouting in cereals with special reference to rice using genomics and transcriptomic approaches.

show abstract

“…Collected placentas (19,(3)(4) at least per experiment) were perfused in a double circuit according to a validated method as previously described [23]. The solutions were put in Earle medium with 25 g/L of bovine serum albumin (Euromedex, Souffelweyersheim, France).…”

Section: Placental Perfusionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Their residues are thus consumed by intensively farmed animals fed with GM soy or corn [ 2 ]. The chemicals from R also more directly enter the human food chain, since wheat and or other cereal crops (e.g., those used for beer) are treated with it before harvest [ 3 ]. These contaminate rivers and other water sources [ 4 ].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Glyphosate-Based Formulation but Not Glyphosate Alone Alters Human Placental Integrity

Simasotchi

Chissey

Jungers

et al. 2021

Toxics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Glyphosate (G)-based herbicidal formulations, such as the most commonly used one, Roundup (R), are major pesticides used worldwide on food and feed. Pregnant women may be frequently exposed to R compounds. These are composed of G, which is declared as the active principle, and other products contained in formulations, named formulants, which have been declared as inerts and diluents by the manufacturers. These formulants have, in fact, been demonstrated to be much more toxic than G, in particular to placental and embryonic human cells. In this work, we thus compared the effect of G and a GT+ formulation named R, using placental perfusion ex vivo. R, but not G alone, was demonstrated to alter the placental permeability of a known small model molecule, antipyrine. Similar results were observed for the fetal venous flow rate. The transfer of G alone increases with time, but is significantly decreased in presence of its formulants. The perfusion of R provokes a destruction of fetal vessels, as demonstrated by immunohistochemistry. Formulants obviously alter the fetal-placental circulation and placental integrity according to time of exposure. Therefore, G does not appear to be the main toxic agent of R. Formulants, although undeclared, include polyoxyethanolamines, PAHs, or heavy metals, and may be responsible for this toxicity. These compounds are also present in other pesticides. The progressive blood flow reduction due to the toxic compounds of formulations may diminish the nutrient supply to the fetus, alter the development, and may enhance the poisoning effects. Although these are preliminary results, they could at least partially explain some adverse pregnancy outcomes in mothers exposed to pesticides or other environmental pollutants. The debate on glyphosate alone is proven insufficient for the understanding of the toxicity.

show abstract

Effects of Pre-Harvest Glyphosate Application on Spring Wheat Quality Characteristics

Cited by 11 publications

References 51 publications

Impact of glyphosate applied preharvest on oat kernel quality

Impact of glyphosate applied preharvest on oat kernel quality

Seed Dormancy and Pre-Harvest Sprouting in Rice—An Updated Overview

A Glyphosate-Based Formulation but Not Glyphosate Alone Alters Human Placental Integrity

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About