2021
DOI: 10.1017/jfm.2021.333
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of power-law entrainment on bubble fragmentation cascades

Abstract: Abstract

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that our simulations stop at the end of the active breaking period, and as such do not describe the late-time plume evolution and steepening of the bubble size distribution, which evolves due to both degassing and further breakup, as discussed by Deane & Stokes (2002), Deike et al. (2016) and Gaylo, Hendrickson & Yue (2021). For , where the numerical resolution is sufficient to allow for a discussion of the sub-Hinze scale bubbles, we observe a scaling compatible with the experimental data set from Deane & Stokes (2002), .…”
Section: Air Entrainment and Bubble Statisticsmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Note that our simulations stop at the end of the active breaking period, and as such do not describe the late-time plume evolution and steepening of the bubble size distribution, which evolves due to both degassing and further breakup, as discussed by Deane & Stokes (2002), Deike et al. (2016) and Gaylo, Hendrickson & Yue (2021). For , where the numerical resolution is sufficient to allow for a discussion of the sub-Hinze scale bubbles, we observe a scaling compatible with the experimental data set from Deane & Stokes (2002), .…”
Section: Air Entrainment and Bubble Statisticsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…For all cases, within this range, the size distributions have developed a shape that is clearly less steep than the super-Hinze results, close to the r −3/2 scaling, but the transition between the two regimes is not as sharp as observed in the experimental data. Note that our simulations stop at the end of the active breaking period, and as such do not describe the late-time plume evolution and steepening of the bubble size distribution, which evolves due to both degassing and further breakup, as discussed by Deane & Stokes (2002), Deike et al (2016) and Gaylo, Hendrickson & Yue (2021). For Bo = 200, where the numerical resolution is sufficient to allow for a discussion of the sub-Hinze scale bubbles, we observe a scaling compatible with the experimental data set from Deane & Stokes (2002), N(r/r H ) ∝ (r/r H ) −3/2 .…”
Section: Bubble Size Distribution Over the Active Breaking Time: Comp...mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The fragmentation model proposed in Garrett et al (2000), which leads to a -10/3 power-law scaling for the bubble size spectrum, embodies an average air supply rate or a source volume due to the entrainment process during wave breaking. The recent work of Gaylo et al (2021) defines an entrainment size distribution of bubble sources which reproduces the same -10/3 scaling for the equilibrium bulk bubble size spectra (for super-Hinze scale bubbles) via fragmentation cascading, in the weak volume injection regime. In our current study, using the CCL algorithm mentioned in the preceding section, we are able to identify the spanwise air cylinders or cavities entrained by the breaking wave during initial stages, and treat them to be the primary source volumes which undergo breakup to generate bubbles.…”
Section: Bubble Size Spectrummentioning
confidence: 80%
“…When modelling the bubble-size distribution, the equilibrium solution () may be available, such as for PBE with only a fragmentation source term (Garrett et al. 2000) or fragmentation with power-law entrainment, where the size distribution of the bubbles injected by entrainment follows a power law (Gaylo, Hendrickson & Yue 2021). The time, , it takes to reach these equilibrium solutions is of interest: if is much less than the time scale over which the flow is transient, we expect an equilibrium fragmentation cascade (generally ) to be obtained.…”
Section: Three Fundamental Time Scales Of Fragmentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gaylo et al. (2021) provide an expression for which allows for arbitrary and , but its derivation is specific to power-law entrainment. For general fragmentation cascades, is characterised by the time it takes for the volume of the largest bubble to reach the Hinze scale (Deike et al.…”
Section: Three Fundamental Time Scales Of Fragmentationmentioning
confidence: 99%