2001
DOI: 10.1080/j148v20n01_05
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Positioning on Functional Reach

Abstract: This study examined the functional reach of fifty-three elderly persons who use a wheelchair and reside in an extended care facility. Forward, right, and left functional reaches were elicited through a goal-directed activity while the participant sat in a wheelchair with a wedge cushion on a solid-seat insert and on the standard wheelchair sling seat. Participants had a statistically significant greater forward reach when using the wheelchair with a wedge cushion and solid-seat insert compared to the sling sea… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
3
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Modified functional reach (MFR) was somewhat better for the P1 group at both the beginning and the end of the observation period which is contrary to the Amos and Brimner (2001) study that found individuals had a significantly greater forward reach with use of a cushion and solid seat insert versus a less supported sling back and seat. MFR improved over time for both groups, suggesting that individuals with hemiplegia functionally accommodate in both seating positions.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Modified functional reach (MFR) was somewhat better for the P1 group at both the beginning and the end of the observation period which is contrary to the Amos and Brimner (2001) study that found individuals had a significantly greater forward reach with use of a cushion and solid seat insert versus a less supported sling back and seat. MFR improved over time for both groups, suggesting that individuals with hemiplegia functionally accommodate in both seating positions.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 90%
“…For example, Borello-France, Burdett, and Gee (1988) found that use of a solid board at both the seat and back rest in individuals with hemiplegia resulted in decreased presence of postural deformity while the boards were in use compared to a sling seat and back. Another study by Amos et al (2001) examined functional reach in wheelchairs with a sling seat versus wheelchairs with a solid seat insert and cushion. Individuals had greater forward reach with use of the cushion and solid seat insert (p. 68).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have investigated the effect of wheelchair configurations or seating systems on reach and UE functional tasks. These studies found results differed depending on the task and the configuration used in the study (2,7,15,18,(26)(27)(28).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…While reaching toward targets placed at 458 from the midsagittal plane to the ipsilateral and contralateral sides, sitting balance as measured by COP displacement and COP velocity was significantly improved when subjects sat on a generic contoured foam cushion vs a flat foam or air flotation cushions. Amos et al (27) studied elderly wheelchair users and determined that a solid seat insert with an anterior wedge cushion vs a sling seat improved forward reaching using a goaldirected activity. Lateral reach distance, however, was not improved with a solid seat insert and wedge.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%