2016
DOI: 10.1139/cjas-2015-0197
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of pork differentiation strategies in Canada on pig performance and carcass characteristics

Abstract: Performance and quality traits were measured in carcasses from combinations of genotype, diet supplement, slaughter weight, and carcass chilling regime. Iberian-crossed pigs had lower live animal performance than Duroc and Lacombe. From 70 to 115 kg, Lacombe pigs grew slightly faster than Duroc. Duroc carcasses had a higher lean percentage, heavier ham and picnic primals, and lighter loins and bellies, compared with Lacombe and Iberian. Heavier carcasses had lower lean yield, except those from Iberian-crossed … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, head-on hot carcass weight and muscle depth were greater than historical observations in Canada, while fat depth was closer in value ( CPC, 1994 ; Pomar et al, 2001 ; Pomar and Marcoux, 2003 ). Head-on hot carcass weight, fat depth, and muscle depth were similar to values reported in recent studies conducted in Canada ( Miar et al, 2014 ; Zhang et al, 2016 ). Likewise, hot carcass weight (compared between head-on hot carcass weight and head-off hot carcass weight), fat depth, and muscle depth were similar in value with the values reported in recent studies conducted in Europe ( Lisiak et al, 2015 ; Knecht et al, 2016 ) and the United States ( Wilson et al, 2016 ; Arkfeld et al, 2017 ).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…In general, head-on hot carcass weight and muscle depth were greater than historical observations in Canada, while fat depth was closer in value ( CPC, 1994 ; Pomar et al, 2001 ; Pomar and Marcoux, 2003 ). Head-on hot carcass weight, fat depth, and muscle depth were similar to values reported in recent studies conducted in Canada ( Miar et al, 2014 ; Zhang et al, 2016 ). Likewise, hot carcass weight (compared between head-on hot carcass weight and head-off hot carcass weight), fat depth, and muscle depth were similar in value with the values reported in recent studies conducted in Europe ( Lisiak et al, 2015 ; Knecht et al, 2016 ) and the United States ( Wilson et al, 2016 ; Arkfeld et al, 2017 ).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Comparatively small litters are characteristic of the Duroc breed (Johnson, 1981; Sonderman and Luebbe, 2008). Yet, use of Duroc as a terminal sire is a mainstay of swine production due to favorable direct effects on growth and carcass traits (Johnson, 1981; Zhang et al, 2016). Early embryonic mortality, affecting litter size, is recognized as a significant issue in swine (Bolet, 1986; Christianson, 1992).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Piau genetic group stood out in the meat quality factor when compared with the Pietrain genetic group, while Duroc genetic group did not differ from the other ones. Duroc pigs are often referred to as a breed of improved meat quality because they have tender meat and lower drip loss compared with other commercial genetic groups (Peloso et al, 2010;Zhang et al, 2016). Naturalized Brazilian pigs contribute positively for the meat quality (Silva et al, 2019), which may be justified by the higher fatness level in Piau pigs and for the fact that these animals are not under selection (Serão et al, 2011).…”
Section: Effects Of Genetic Group Nutritional Plan and Sex On Latent ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even though differences in carcass and meat quality traits across genetic groups have been observed, pigs usually show similar performance traits (Ventura et al, 2012;Veloso et al, 2019;Nakev and Popova, 2020). Differences in performance are more evident when comparing animals with outstanding genetics to not selected animals (Zhang et al, 2015(Zhang et al, , 2016.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%