2019
DOI: 10.3390/app9235130
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Pore Structures of Different Maceral Compositions on Methane Adsorption and Diffusion in Anthracite

Abstract: The pore structure of coal reservoirs is the main factor influencing the adsorption–diffusion rates of coalbed methane. Mercury intrusion porosimetry (MIP), low-pressure nitrogen adsorption (LP-NA), low-pressure carbon dioxide adsorption (LP-CA), and isothermal adsorption experiments with different macerals were performed to characterize the comprehensive pore distribution and methane adsorption–diffusion of coal. On the basis of the fractal theory, the pore structures determined through MIP and LP-NA can be c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, the adsorption capacity of non-magnetic diatomites (DE-APTES) was found to be 28.8 and 15.6 mg g −1 with an initial endosulfan concentration of 750 and 100 mg L −1 , respectively (Figure 7). The higher adsorption capacity of m-DE-APTES compared with DE-APTES may be due to the greater effective surface area and pore size (Toprak and Kopac, 2019;Zhao et al, 2019). The effect of temperature was also investigated by altering the temperature from 4 to 40 °C while using different endosulfan concentrations (100-750 mg L −1 ) (Figure 8).…”
Section: Adsorption-desorption Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the adsorption capacity of non-magnetic diatomites (DE-APTES) was found to be 28.8 and 15.6 mg g −1 with an initial endosulfan concentration of 750 and 100 mg L −1 , respectively (Figure 7). The higher adsorption capacity of m-DE-APTES compared with DE-APTES may be due to the greater effective surface area and pore size (Toprak and Kopac, 2019;Zhao et al, 2019). The effect of temperature was also investigated by altering the temperature from 4 to 40 °C while using different endosulfan concentrations (100-750 mg L −1 ) (Figure 8).…”
Section: Adsorption-desorption Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The coal range and the burial depth play a significant role in the adsorption capacity of the methane gas and in the maceral composition (e.g. Laxminarayana and Crosdale 1993; Bustin and Bustin 2016;Li et al 2016;Hou et al 2019;Zhao et al 2019;Busch et al 2019), as well as defining the quality of the coal deposit (Farhaduzzaman et al 2012;Miao 2016in Hou et al 2019. Also, according to the deposit environment, it allows the evaluation of the seal conditions of the adjacent rocks (Li et al 2014).…”
Section: Basin Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CT scanning method can be used for non-destructive pore structure testing within the coal sample, but the pores tested are mainly mesopores and macropores. The low-field NMR method can test the nuclei with odd numbers of nucleons, and then can be used to conduct non-destructive sophisticate characterization of the whole process of pore and fracture development in the coal sample [26,27]. The test has a wide range of applications and can measure small, medium, and large holes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%