2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2015.04.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of plant roots on soil-water retention and induced suction in vegetated soil

Abstract: Abstract:Plant evapotranspiration (ET) is considered to be a hydrological effect that would induce soil suction and hence influence the stability of geotechnical infrastructure. However, other hydrological effect, such as the change of soil water retention curve (SWRC) induced by roots, is generally ignored. This study aims to investigate and compare the effects of root-induced changes in SWRC with the effects of ET on suction responses in clayey sand. Two series of laboratory tests together with 21 numerical … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
80
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 203 publications
(95 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
7
80
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…5). The laboratory study conducted by Leung et al (2015b) also showed that the effects of vegetation on the change in soil hydraulic properties, including not only soil hydraulic conductivity but also soil water retention curve (SWRC), played a more significant role in the suction responses under rainfall, compared to the effects of ET.…”
Section: Effects Of Tree Spacing On Suction Responses During Rainfallmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…5). The laboratory study conducted by Leung et al (2015b) also showed that the effects of vegetation on the change in soil hydraulic properties, including not only soil hydraulic conductivity but also soil water retention curve (SWRC), played a more significant role in the suction responses under rainfall, compared to the effects of ET.…”
Section: Effects Of Tree Spacing On Suction Responses During Rainfallmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Grass that has relatively shallow root system may be effective for soil erosion control, while tree has relatively stronger and deeper root system which may be used for mechanical soil stabilisation. Despite of rather different root systems, transpiration would happen for both types of species, causing a change in matric suction (Pollen-bankhead and Simon 2010; Garg et al 2015b; Leung et al 2015b;Ng et al 2013Ng et al , 2014Ng et al , 2016a and consequently the soil hydrology (Simon and Collison 2002;Smethurst et al 2015;Ng et al 2016c). The increase in matric suction due to plant transpiration would result in a decrease in soil hydraulic conductivity (Ng and Leung 2012) and also an increase in soil shear strength (Ng and Menzies 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…x 10 -7 m/s (Leung et al, 2015b). In each test box, a 280 mm thick layer of SC was compacted to a dry density of 1500 kg m -3 ± 2% (i.e., equivalent to 80% of the maximum dry density) at water content of 12% (by mass) using the undercompaction method (Ladd, 1977).…”
Section: Soil Type and Box Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Extensive field and laboratory studies have shown that transpiration-induced suction could be maintained in the soil during and after rainfall Ng et al 2014;Rahardjo et al 2014;Leung et al 2015a;Ng et al in press). Recent research also argues that the presence of roots could affect the soil water retention properties and hence the suction responses (Bengough 2012;Carminati and Vetterlein 2013;Scholl et al 2014;Leung et al 2015b;Ng et al 2016aNg et al , 2016b. The ability of plants to preserve/maintain suction has important implications for slope stability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%