2021
DOI: 10.1016/s2095-3119(20)63286-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of plant density and mepiquat chloride application on cotton boll setting in wheat–cotton double cropping system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…High PPD tends to concentrate boll setting on rst-position sympodial sites (Wilson et al, 2007). Combined high PPD and MC application produce more bolls residing on lower (Gwathmey and Clement, 2010) or low-middle sympodias (Mao et al, 2015), while Chen et al reported more bolls are positioned at the upper and middle canopy (Chen et al, 2021). More concentrated boll distribution due to the combination of high PPD and MC application implies a more synchronous demand for carbohydrates (Gwathmey and Clement, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…High PPD tends to concentrate boll setting on rst-position sympodial sites (Wilson et al, 2007). Combined high PPD and MC application produce more bolls residing on lower (Gwathmey and Clement, 2010) or low-middle sympodias (Mao et al, 2015), while Chen et al reported more bolls are positioned at the upper and middle canopy (Chen et al, 2021). More concentrated boll distribution due to the combination of high PPD and MC application implies a more synchronous demand for carbohydrates (Gwathmey and Clement, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…High PPD coupled with the optimal timing and dosage of MC improves cotton productivity (Ren et al, 2013;Gu et al, 2014;Chen et al, 2021). High PPD tends to concentrate boll setting on rst-position sympodial sites (Wilson et al, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this technique has faced challenges recently due to the aging of rural labors and rapid urbanization causing increased labor costs [3][4][5]. In contrast, DSCWH presents a simplified, more efficient alternative to overcome the labor-intensive problem of transplanting [6][7][8]. Therefore, the DSCWH planting pattern has experienced significant growth in the cottongrowing regions in recent years [9,10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%