2009
DOI: 10.1080/00016480802311049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Piezosurgery® on the cochlear outer hair cells

Abstract: Piezosurgery showed its safety on the inner ear and in particular on the cochlear outer hair cells: for each instrumental examination (pure-tone audiometry, tympanometry, TEOAE, DPOAEs and ABR), no patients presented postoperative worsening.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
22
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(12 reference statements)
2
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The major surgical challenges of removing obstructive EAC osteoma are related to proximity of the temporomandibular joint, facial nerve injury, inability to visualize the medial EAC landmarks, the thin skin covering the osteoma, and contact with the tympanic membrane [1,2,10]. Table 1 Audiologic results (mean § SD) before (t = 1) and 6 months after (t = 2) the surgical treatment The main advantage of the piezoelectric device is its selective cut that recognizes tissue hardness and works only on mineralized structures without soft-tissue damage [3][4][5][6][7][8]. For these reasons no patient experienced soft-tissue injuries such as tympanic membrane perforation, facial nerve or chorda tympani damage, skin lesion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The major surgical challenges of removing obstructive EAC osteoma are related to proximity of the temporomandibular joint, facial nerve injury, inability to visualize the medial EAC landmarks, the thin skin covering the osteoma, and contact with the tympanic membrane [1,2,10]. Table 1 Audiologic results (mean § SD) before (t = 1) and 6 months after (t = 2) the surgical treatment The main advantage of the piezoelectric device is its selective cut that recognizes tissue hardness and works only on mineralized structures without soft-tissue damage [3][4][5][6][7][8]. For these reasons no patient experienced soft-tissue injuries such as tympanic membrane perforation, facial nerve or chorda tympani damage, skin lesion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The audiologic results show the safety of the piezoelectric device on the inner ear and in particular on the cochlear outer hair cells and highlight its applicability in the removal of EAC osteoma: the postoperative presence of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) and distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAE) highlights the absence of an ultrasound eVect such as ampliWcation, damage, etc., on the inner ear and in particular on the cochlear outer hair cells, by the piezoelectric device, whereas the literature reports ultrasound induced damage of vessels with ultrasound at a frequency of 750 kHz [5] (Table 1).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations