2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2020.113061
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of physical activity on brain function and structure in older adults: A systematic review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
51
1
4

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
4
51
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Their dietary pattern that was high in fat and sugar accompanied with sedentary lifestyle contributed to the risk of poor cognitive function (Shahar et al, 2019 ; Xu et al, 2017 ). For physical activity status, other study found similar finding (Woodard et al, 2012 ) whereby physical activity was found to be associated with larger brain volumes (fewer brain atrophy) specifically in brain regions vulnerable to dementia, comprising the hippocampus, temporal, and frontal regions based on the results from structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (Domingos, Pego, & Santos, 2021 ). Next, for educational factor, this study found that respondents who do not refuse tertiary education (higher educational level) had statistically significant higher MoCA score as compared to those who refuse tertiary education (lower educational level).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Their dietary pattern that was high in fat and sugar accompanied with sedentary lifestyle contributed to the risk of poor cognitive function (Shahar et al, 2019 ; Xu et al, 2017 ). For physical activity status, other study found similar finding (Woodard et al, 2012 ) whereby physical activity was found to be associated with larger brain volumes (fewer brain atrophy) specifically in brain regions vulnerable to dementia, comprising the hippocampus, temporal, and frontal regions based on the results from structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (Domingos, Pego, & Santos, 2021 ). Next, for educational factor, this study found that respondents who do not refuse tertiary education (higher educational level) had statistically significant higher MoCA score as compared to those who refuse tertiary education (lower educational level).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Specifically, the metabolic level of the parietal area in patients with HF was reportedly reduced compared with that in healthy volunteers [ 51 , 52 ]. However, in HF patients with hibernating myocardium and impaired global left ventricular function, the metabolism of the frontal lobe area was compensatorily increased, while glucose metabolism of the hippocampus and parahippocampus, which are vulnerable to dementia, was decreased, leading to memory loss [ 50 , 53 ]. These differential changes in metabolic activity were related to self-regulation efficiency in different areas [ 54 ].…”
Section: Potential Mechanisms Of Cognitive Dysfunction After Heart Diseasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity function, the metabolism of the frontal lobe area was compensatorily increased, while glucose metabolism of the hippocampus and parahippocampus, which are vulnerable to dementia, was decreased, leading to memory loss [50,53]. These differential changes in metabolic activity were related to self-regulation efficiency in different areas [54].…”
Section: Blood Perfusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our findings are in line with a previous study reporting strengthened connectivity between regions involved in the sensorimotor network, cerebellar and visual network, following a 13-week cognitive and motor skills training intervention ( Demirakca et al, 2016 ). Task based fMRI has also highlighted a greater BOLD response in regions involved in these networks ( Domingos et al, 2021 ). For example, the supplementary motor areas, precentral gyrus, angular gyrus and supramarginal gyrus were among the areas to demonstrate greater BOLD activation during a famous face recognitions task, in a group of adults (age range = 65 to 85) reporting high physical activity levels ( n = 34) relative to a low physical activity group ( n = 34, Smith et al, 2011 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%