1973
DOI: 10.1080/00071667308416062
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of photoperiod during incubation on embryonic and post‐embryonic development of quail and chickens1

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
18
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
2
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The data on navel score for these experiments suggest that treatment has no effect on the parameter; however, the fact that there is numerical separation of data due to treatment in experiment 2 coupled with data from previous experiments (Walter and Voitle, 1971;Voitle, 1970) suggests that these latter differences may be real. The fact that the data on navel score from experiment 1 differs from the results obtained in previous experiments can be explained in part by the fact that the electrical power was off in all incubators for a period of 12 hours.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The data on navel score for these experiments suggest that treatment has no effect on the parameter; however, the fact that there is numerical separation of data due to treatment in experiment 2 coupled with data from previous experiments (Walter and Voitle, 1971;Voitle, 1970) suggests that these latter differences may be real. The fact that the data on navel score from experiment 1 differs from the results obtained in previous experiments can be explained in part by the fact that the electrical power was off in all incubators for a period of 12 hours.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…T HE effects of photoperiod during incubation on the embryonic and postembryonic development of egg-type chickens have been reviewed by Walter and Voitle (1971). In addition they reported that, regardless of species, the development of the embryos was accelerated, initial body weight was unaffected and the incidence of healed navels was increased by increasing the length of exposure to light during incubation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Shutze et al (1962) first reported that continuous incandescent treatment during embryogenesis accelerated chick embryo development and shortened incubation time compared with continuous colored light treatment and commercial dark condition. Some other studies also found the similar phenomenon in White Rock chickens (Siegel et al, 1969), Rhode Island Red domestic fowl (Adam and Dimond, 1971), quail and broilers (Walter and Voitle, 1973). However, Lauber (1975) observed that the White Leghorn eggs stimulated with green light or blue-violet light showed a significantly higher embryo weight.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Under regular conditions in hatcheries, eggs are incubated in darkness. Early studies indicated that white-light illumination accelerates embryonic development of several avian species (6,7,38,46). Eggs incubated under white light hatched ϳ1 day earlier than those incubated in the dark (7,38,45).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%