Effects of Photodynamic Therapy on Gram-Positive and Gram-Negative Bacterial Biofilms by Bioluminescence Imaging and Scanning Electron Microscopic Analysis
“…Based on this context, various studies have been developed to investigate the efficacy of alternative approaches against E. faecalis, including antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (PDT) [16][17][18][20][21][22][23][24][25]. PDT is a therapeutic strategy that involves the combination of a nontoxic photosensitizer (PS) and a harmless visible light source [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this reason, the action of different PSs has been the subject of widespread research, mainly phenothiazine dyes, porphyrins, and phthalocyanines [22]. Currently, the association of methylene blue (MB), with lasers at red wavelengths (600-700 nm), has been widely used for bacterial management in endodontic treatment by PDT [16][17][18][20][21][22][23][24][25]. In the presence of a light source, permeability to MB can vary according to the structural components present on the surface of the microorganisms, reducing their antimicrobial effects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is due to differences in the physiology of these microorganisms, since Gram-positive bacteria have a relatively porous outer membrane formed by a thicker layer of peptidoglycan and lipoteichoic acid. This feature allows a greater diffusion of the MB within the microbial cells, since they can be eliminated by lower concentration of this dye and lower doses of radiation, which explains the greater susceptibility of E. faecalis to PDT [20][21][22][23][24][25]. On the other hand, the outer membrane of Gram-negative bacteria is thinner and complex, being formed by a heterogeneous composition of proteins with porin function, lipopolysaccharides, and lipoproteins.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In vitro [16][17][18][20][21][22][23][24][25] and clinical [31] studies have supported the use of PDT to eliminate microorganisms in a root canal, particularly E. faecalis, a multiple drug resistance microorganism often associated with endodontic treatment failure. Although the role of E. faecalis in endodontic infections had been extensively studied, little is known about the presence of E. faecium and its role in endodontic infections.…”
Introduction Enterococcus faecium has become an important microorganism in nosocomial infections with great ability to acquire antibiotic resistance. However, little is known about their presence on the oral cavity. Therefore, our objective was to verify the presence of E. faecium and E. faecalis in endodontic infections and compare their susceptibility to conventional antibiotics and photodynamic therapy. Methods We performed 38 collections from the root canals of different patients. Positive Enterococcus agar samples were submitted to phenotypic and genotypic testing for speciesspecific confirmation. The isolates identified as E. faecium and E. faecalis were tested for susceptibility to antibiotics by the E-test method. After that, the isolates were evaluated for susceptibility to photodynamic therapy (PDT) using methylene blue and gallium arsenide aluminum laser with a wavelength of 660 nm and fluence of 39.5 J/cm 2 (energy of 15 J and time of 428 s).Results Cultures positive for E. faecalis were found in 22 patients (58%). Among these patients, only two had E. faecium in mixed infections with E. faecalis. In the isolates of E. faecalis, 27% were resistant to antibiotics, including tetracycline, ciprofloxacin, and azithromycin. The isolates of E. faecium showed no resistance to the antibiotics tested. Both the isolates of E. faecium and E. faecalis exhibit significant susceptibility to PDT, including the isolates resistant to antibiotics. The reductions achieved by PDT ranged of 2.76 to 4.31 log 10 for E. faecalis strains and of 3.93 to 4.33 log 10 for E. faecium strains. Conclusion E. faecium showed lower prevalence in endodontic infections and higher susceptibility to antibiotics when compared to E. faecalis. In in vitro assays, PDT had a significant antimicrobial activity for both strains.
“…Based on this context, various studies have been developed to investigate the efficacy of alternative approaches against E. faecalis, including antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (PDT) [16][17][18][20][21][22][23][24][25]. PDT is a therapeutic strategy that involves the combination of a nontoxic photosensitizer (PS) and a harmless visible light source [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this reason, the action of different PSs has been the subject of widespread research, mainly phenothiazine dyes, porphyrins, and phthalocyanines [22]. Currently, the association of methylene blue (MB), with lasers at red wavelengths (600-700 nm), has been widely used for bacterial management in endodontic treatment by PDT [16][17][18][20][21][22][23][24][25]. In the presence of a light source, permeability to MB can vary according to the structural components present on the surface of the microorganisms, reducing their antimicrobial effects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is due to differences in the physiology of these microorganisms, since Gram-positive bacteria have a relatively porous outer membrane formed by a thicker layer of peptidoglycan and lipoteichoic acid. This feature allows a greater diffusion of the MB within the microbial cells, since they can be eliminated by lower concentration of this dye and lower doses of radiation, which explains the greater susceptibility of E. faecalis to PDT [20][21][22][23][24][25]. On the other hand, the outer membrane of Gram-negative bacteria is thinner and complex, being formed by a heterogeneous composition of proteins with porin function, lipopolysaccharides, and lipoproteins.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In vitro [16][17][18][20][21][22][23][24][25] and clinical [31] studies have supported the use of PDT to eliminate microorganisms in a root canal, particularly E. faecalis, a multiple drug resistance microorganism often associated with endodontic treatment failure. Although the role of E. faecalis in endodontic infections had been extensively studied, little is known about the presence of E. faecium and its role in endodontic infections.…”
Introduction Enterococcus faecium has become an important microorganism in nosocomial infections with great ability to acquire antibiotic resistance. However, little is known about their presence on the oral cavity. Therefore, our objective was to verify the presence of E. faecium and E. faecalis in endodontic infections and compare their susceptibility to conventional antibiotics and photodynamic therapy. Methods We performed 38 collections from the root canals of different patients. Positive Enterococcus agar samples were submitted to phenotypic and genotypic testing for speciesspecific confirmation. The isolates identified as E. faecium and E. faecalis were tested for susceptibility to antibiotics by the E-test method. After that, the isolates were evaluated for susceptibility to photodynamic therapy (PDT) using methylene blue and gallium arsenide aluminum laser with a wavelength of 660 nm and fluence of 39.5 J/cm 2 (energy of 15 J and time of 428 s).Results Cultures positive for E. faecalis were found in 22 patients (58%). Among these patients, only two had E. faecium in mixed infections with E. faecalis. In the isolates of E. faecalis, 27% were resistant to antibiotics, including tetracycline, ciprofloxacin, and azithromycin. The isolates of E. faecium showed no resistance to the antibiotics tested. Both the isolates of E. faecium and E. faecalis exhibit significant susceptibility to PDT, including the isolates resistant to antibiotics. The reductions achieved by PDT ranged of 2.76 to 4.31 log 10 for E. faecalis strains and of 3.93 to 4.33 log 10 for E. faecium strains. Conclusion E. faecium showed lower prevalence in endodontic infections and higher susceptibility to antibiotics when compared to E. faecalis. In in vitro assays, PDT had a significant antimicrobial activity for both strains.
“…De fato, desde os últimos anos do século passado, junto às pesquisas da TFD antineoplásica, estudos sobre a terapia fotodinâmica antimicrobiana vêm sendo realizados, apresentando bons resultados de inativação microbiana, tanto em bactérias (WAINWRIGHT, 1998;DEMINOVA e HAMBLIM, 2004;PRATES et al, 2007;GARCEZ et al, 2013), como em fungos (GIROLDO et al, 2009;DOVIGO et al, 2010e 2011) e protozoários (BARBOSA et al, 2012 usando também, outras substâncias fotossensibilizadoras além do AM, como azul de toluidina, verde malaquita, eritrosina (VILELA et al, 2012;SOUZA, R. et al, 2010, LEE et al 2012.…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.