2007
DOI: 10.1134/s1990747807020080
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of pH on structural and functional properties of porin from the outer membrane of Yersinia pseudotuberculosis. II. Characterization of pH-induced conformational intermediates of yersinin

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both residues have a hydrophobic microenvironment, but Trp56 is more hydrophobic. Trp106 residues localized in L3 loops and inside the pore cavity manifest a higher accessibility for solvent molecules [1].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Both residues have a hydrophobic microenvironment, but Trp56 is more hydrophobic. Trp106 residues localized in L3 loops and inside the pore cavity manifest a higher accessibility for solvent molecules [1].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The OmpF-like porin of the Gram-negative bacteria Yersinia pseudotuberculosis (YOmpF) is a cylinder-shaped homotrimeric protein that forms a non-specific transmembrane channel, allowing passive diffusion of hydrophilic low-molecular-mass substances across the bacterial outer membrane [1]. Thus, the protein-lipid interactions are crucial for cellular functions of this protein.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A wide range of pH stability provides plasticity to proteins. Porin from Yersinia pseudotuberculosis was studied for its wide pH range (2.0 to 8.0) for its plasticity and structural rearrangement 39 , 40 . β-barrel proteins show a blue-shift and a few folds less intensity in Trp fluorescence spectra upon unfolding 41 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By some estimates, over a third of all mammalian proteins participate in two or more protein–protein interactions,4 each of which may be modeled as a distinct structural state. Moreover, many proteins are highly sensitive to cellular conditions (e.g., pH,5 ion concentration,6 oxidative state,7 temperature8), the presence of small molecules,9 and post‐translational covalent modifications (e.g., phosphorylation10, 11). Perturbations in these conditions can induce moderate to large conformational changes, and some proteins have multiple well‐defined structural states that depend on such conditions12–14 or protein–protein interactions 15.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%