2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2023.121479
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of PFOS, F-53B and OBS on locomotor behaviour, the dopaminergic system and mitochondrial function in developing zebrafish (Danio rerio)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To study PFOS effects on zebrafish larvae, we chose to immerse larvae in media containing PFOS, facilitating quick uptake. Nevertheless, as in similar studies of larval zebrafish behavior (Gaballah et al, 2020;Han et al, 2021;Kalyn et al, 2023;Rericha et al, 2021;Tal & Vogs, 2021;Ulhaq et al, 2013), this approach also necessitated short-term exposures in solutions with PFOS concentrations (2-20 µM) that exceeded typical environmental levels of 0.1 to 600 ng/L (2.0 pM-1.2 nM; Hansen et al, 2002) to achieve significant bioaccumulation. Although environmental and laboratory exposures have inherent differences that must be considered, the concentrations of the same magnitude used in our experiments can exist in the environment because levels as high as 17,000 µg/L (34 µM) have been observed in contaminated water due to spills (Moody et al, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To study PFOS effects on zebrafish larvae, we chose to immerse larvae in media containing PFOS, facilitating quick uptake. Nevertheless, as in similar studies of larval zebrafish behavior (Gaballah et al, 2020;Han et al, 2021;Kalyn et al, 2023;Rericha et al, 2021;Tal & Vogs, 2021;Ulhaq et al, 2013), this approach also necessitated short-term exposures in solutions with PFOS concentrations (2-20 µM) that exceeded typical environmental levels of 0.1 to 600 ng/L (2.0 pM-1.2 nM; Hansen et al, 2002) to achieve significant bioaccumulation. Although environmental and laboratory exposures have inherent differences that must be considered, the concentrations of the same magnitude used in our experiments can exist in the environment because levels as high as 17,000 µg/L (34 µM) have been observed in contaminated water due to spills (Moody et al, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such, they provide an excellent experimental framework to study the impacts of PFAS on nervous system function and on complex behaviors. Zebrafish embryos and larvae have been used to assess the impacts of PFAS, including PFOS, on development, immune response, and locomotor behaviors (Gaballah et al, 2020;Han et al, 2021;Kalyn et al, 2023;Paquette et al, 2022;Rericha et al, 2021;Tal & Vogs, 2021;Ulhaq et al, 2013). At early stages, zebrafish skin is highly permeable, and PFAS are readily absorbed (Tal & Vogs, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wang et al [ 50 ] observed that the flame retardant DE-71 impaired the cholinergic system and locomotor activity of zebrafish larvae by dysregulating calcium homeostasis. Moreover, zebrafish locomotion is regulated by the dopaminergic system [ 51 , 52 ], which is known to be disturbed by BDE-47 [ 15 , 41 ]. Indeed, harmed locomotor behavior, given by limited moving capability, can affect the survival of larvae and is a potential ecological threat [ 46 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, neurotoxicity was observed for certain PFOS alternatives. For example, perfluorobutane sulfonate (PFBS), a short-chain PFOS alternative, has been shown to cause impairment of visual function in marine medaka ( Oryzias melastigma ) and developmental neurotoxicity in zebrafish ( D. rerio ). , Another PFOS alternative, 6:2 chlorinated polyfluorinated ether sulfonate (Cl-PFESA), can interfere with amino acid neurotransmitter metabolism, disrupt blood-brain barrier formation in the brain of zebrafish ( D. rerio ), and influence their locomotion behavior. , These studies provide evidence that PFOS alternatives, similar to PFOS, have the potential to induce neurotoxicity. However, despite the widespread occurrence of PFECHS in environmental and biological samples in recent years, the potential neurotoxic effects of this PFOS alternative have not been investigated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%