2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.etap.2008.11.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of perfluorooctane sulfonate on ion channels and glutamate-activated current in cultured rat hippocampal neurons

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
(55 reference statements)
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although exposure duration in our study was shorter and no cytotoxicity was observed, the increase in spike and burst activity following acute exposure of rat primary cortical neurons to a high PFOS concentration could be indicative of the onset of excitotoxicity. Another potential explanation for the inhibition of activity in the hiPSC-derived neuronal cultures could reside in the PFOS-induced shift in the activation curves of voltage-gated sodium channels towards hyperpolarization 37,69 , making it harder for the cell to reach an action potential. Future research to elucidate the possible counteracting mechanisms of action observed in our network study of PFOS and PFOA could focus on patch-clamp studies in neuronal networks following both acute and chronic exposure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although exposure duration in our study was shorter and no cytotoxicity was observed, the increase in spike and burst activity following acute exposure of rat primary cortical neurons to a high PFOS concentration could be indicative of the onset of excitotoxicity. Another potential explanation for the inhibition of activity in the hiPSC-derived neuronal cultures could reside in the PFOS-induced shift in the activation curves of voltage-gated sodium channels towards hyperpolarization 37,69 , making it harder for the cell to reach an action potential. Future research to elucidate the possible counteracting mechanisms of action observed in our network study of PFOS and PFOA could focus on patch-clamp studies in neuronal networks following both acute and chronic exposure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At (high) micromolar concentrations, PFOS and/or PFOA can affect a range of (pre)-synaptic processes, including reduction of cell viability [26][27][28][29] , altered neuronal differentiation 30 , increased formation of reactive oxygen species 27,28,[31][32][33][34] , and increased intracellular calcium (Ca 2+ ) concentrations 35,36 . In addition, PFOS and PFOA may also affect postsynaptic processes, including altered glutamate-activated currents and increase of potassium currents 37,38 . By inducing influx of Ca 2+ through voltage-dependent calcium channels, PFOS may exhibit acute excitotoxic effects on synaptic function and chronically inhibit synaptogenesis in rat brain hippocampal neurons 39 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The toxicological effects of PFOS have been reported numerous times, mainly based on in vivo and in vitro mammalian studies. The liver, lung and kidney might serve as the main target organs (Seacat et al, 2002;Liao et al, 2009). Some research has investigated whether prenatal exposure of PFOS causes neonatal rat lung morphological changes and rat early death, which may be involved in inhibiting lung maturation (Grasty et al, 2003(Grasty et al, , 2005.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cells were cultured in a cell bottle for several days, during which cell culture medium was changed every other day, and the cells were subcultured until the cells were fully differentiated. The differentiated PC12 cells were treated with 0.05%DMSO or different concentrations of PFOS (10, 50, 100, 150 and 200 μM) for 48 hr, or with 100 μM PFOS for 0, 12, 24, 36, 48 hr (Liao et al, 2009;Liao et al, 2008). PFOS was dissolved in DMSO.…”
Section: Cell Culture and Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%