2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0378-1127(00)00647-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of pattern and severity of pruning on growth and branch development of pre-canopy closure Eucalyptus nitens

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
31
2
4

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
3
31
2
4
Order By: Relevance
“…While highly ranked, the impact was more severe for E. globulus. The presence of these defects in the peeled veneer supports the findings of previous research studies, which have shown that these species may not heal well after pruning or self-pruning, with the section of stem-wood laid down post-prining being prone to decay entry and slow occlusion (Wardlaw and Neilson 1999;Pinkard 2002;Pinkard et al 2004;Deflorio et al 2007).…”
Section: Visual Gradingsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While highly ranked, the impact was more severe for E. globulus. The presence of these defects in the peeled veneer supports the findings of previous research studies, which have shown that these species may not heal well after pruning or self-pruning, with the section of stem-wood laid down post-prining being prone to decay entry and slow occlusion (Wardlaw and Neilson 1999;Pinkard 2002;Pinkard et al 2004;Deflorio et al 2007).…”
Section: Visual Gradingsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The presence of defects, including bark pockets and decay, which were mostly associated with knots, encased knots, surface roughness, and gum pockets in similar proportions across all sites, suggest that at the Deans Marsh site the pruning had not been effective in allowing clear wood to be produced. This may be due to suboptimal pruning techniques, timing and procedures, and/or may be a physiological characteristic of this species (Wardlaw and Neilson 1999;Pinkard 2002;Pinkard et al 2004;O'Hara 2007;Deflorio et al 2007). An additional influence may be the below average rainfall (665 mm in 2004, 709 mm in 2005, and 474 mm in 2006 recorded at the site compared with a 852 mm long-term average) the Deans Marsh site received for the three years following the last pruning.…”
Section: Visual Gradingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pinkard (2003) recomendou remoção de até 20% de área foliar em sítios pobres e até 40% em sítios mais produtivos. Porém, deve-se levar em conta, também, a capacidade de recuperação e crescimento da copa, o que influencia o posterior crescimento do tronco das plantas (PINKARD, 2002;LIMA, 2003;PULRONIK et al, 2005).…”
Section: Resultsunclassified
“…Higher initial stocking densities reduce the incidence of large branches (Neilsen and Gerrand 1999) but may lead to a reduction in the average growth of individual trees. Unlike lift pruning, form pruning selectively removes branches throughout the crown and can be used to reduce average branch size before subsequent lift pruning (Pinkard 2002). It can also be used to correct potential deviation of stems from a pathway of vertical growth (Nicholas andGifford 1995, Medhurst et al 2003).…”
Section: Thinningmentioning
confidence: 99%