2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2014.09.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Patient Position on Right-to-Left Shunt Detection by Contrast Transcranial Doppler

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some studies have shown that the upright sitting position is the best position for detecting RLS. 26,27 This was relatively more comfortable and easily achieved.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Some studies have shown that the upright sitting position is the best position for detecting RLS. 26,27 This was relatively more comfortable and easily achieved.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Second, TCD monitoring was performed in the right lateral decubitus position, although this was not the most optimal position for detecting RLS. 26,27 Therefore, we chose the BA instead of VA and compared it to the MCA in our study. The advantages of using agitated saline while performing the TCD in a suboccipital window (for insonation of the BA) can be explained by several reasons.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, MESs were measured only on the supine position, our method allows us to investigate further patients with prone and sitting postures. Some studies have shown that the upright sitting position is the best position for detecting RLS 40 , 41 . This was relatively more comfortable and easily achieved.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The criterion of a “valid procedure” is that the spectrum of the M-mode remains stable. Secondly, the right lateral decubitus was not the optimal position for RLS detection, due to the anatomic location of the right atrium and patent foreman ovale, which may have affected the performance of the standard VM 18 19 20 21 . However, MCA and VA monitoring were performed simultaneously in the same position, even if the positive rate of RLS detection may be a little lower than that in other positions; however, the comparison between MCA and VA monitoring was not affected.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%