1991
DOI: 10.2105/ajph.81.8.1029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of paternal occupational exposure on spontaneous abortions.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Paternal exposure to mutagenic agents has been suggested to affect pregnancy outcome adversely. METHODS: A nationwide data base of medically diagnosed spontaneous abortions and other pregnancies and national census data was used to evaluate the effects of men's occupational exposures on risk of spontaneous abortion in 99,186 pregnancies in Finland. Census data from the years 1975 and 1980 provided information about the occupation, industry, and socioeconomic status. A job-exposure classification wa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
39
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Using national databases to identify the outcomes of 99,186 pregnancies in Finland between 1973and 1982, Lindbohm et al (1991a determined that paternal employment in a job considered likely to involve lead exposure was not associated with an increased risk of spontaneous abortion (odds ratio [OR], 0.9; 95% CI, 0.8 -1.0). In a second study, using a case-referent design (213 cases, 500 matched referents), Lindbohm et al (1991b) classified men according to their lead exposure during the period of spermatogenesis of the index pregnancy.…”
Section: Spontaneous Abortionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using national databases to identify the outcomes of 99,186 pregnancies in Finland between 1973and 1982, Lindbohm et al (1991a determined that paternal employment in a job considered likely to involve lead exposure was not associated with an increased risk of spontaneous abortion (odds ratio [OR], 0.9; 95% CI, 0.8 -1.0). In a second study, using a case-referent design (213 cases, 500 matched referents), Lindbohm et al (1991b) classified men according to their lead exposure during the period of spermatogenesis of the index pregnancy.…”
Section: Spontaneous Abortionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When employed women are compared with unemployed women, a selection bias may also arise, if reproductive experience affects the likelihood of entering or remaining in the workforce (18,19). In Finland in 1976 and 1980, the difference in the risk of spontaneous abortion was, however, small between employed (9.8%) and unemployed women (8.6%) in the socioeconomic group of employers, own-account workers, and upper-level employees [Lindbohm et al, some unpublished results from a previous study (12)l. Thus the comparison of the practicing veterinarians with the group of other employed and unemployed women may have enhanced slightly the difference between these groups, but it is unlikely to explain totally the veterinarians' increased risk of spontaneous abortion in the 1970s.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The risk among the veterinarians was compared with the risk among all other Finnish women and with the risk among other upper-level employees. Information on the risk of spontaneous abortion among upper-level employees was based on the data of our previous study (12), and it was available only for the period 1973-1982. In this study (12), the 1975 and 1980 national censuses of the Central Statistical Office of Finland provided information on the socioeconomic status of all women with pregnancies identified from the Hospital Discharge Register and policlinic records.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A Finnish study based on census-derived jobtitles indicated an enhanced risk for spontaneous abortions among wives to rubber workers (Lindbohm et al 1991). In a similar Canadian study, an increased risk for congenital malformations, although not statistically signiWcant, was observed among infants born to women working in rubber and plastics industries (McDonald et al 1988).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%