Effects of passive integrated transponder tags on survival and growth of juvenile Atlantic salmon Salmo salar

Abstract

Background: A laboratory experiment was conducted to assess the potential impacts of surgically implanted 23 and 32 mm passive integrated transponder (PIT) tags on survival, growth, and body condition of juvenile Atlantic salmon Salmo salar. Rate of tag retention and healing of the tagging incision were also evaluated. Atlantic salmon of three different size classes (I: 80 to 99 mm fork length (FL), II: 100 to 119 mm FL, III: 120 to 135 mm FL) were allocated to each of five experimental treatment groups: control, sham-operated (surgery without PIT-tag implantation), 23 mm PIT-tag implantation with and without suture closure of the incision, and 32 mm PIT-tag implantation without suture closure. Results: Over the 35-day experiment, mortality occurred only among fish tagged with 32 mm PIT tags (14%) and all fish larger than 103 mm FL survived. Non-sutured Atlantic salmon between 80 and 99 mm FL implanted with 23 mm PIT tags had a significantly lower mean specific growth rate of mass compared with untagged (control and sham-operated) and sutured conspecifics. However, no significant difference in growth was found between untagged fish and 23 mm PIT-tagged fish 100 to 135 mm FL. Implantation of 32 mm PIT tags decreased growth in all size classes. Regardless of size class, body condition of the fish was not affected by PIT tagging. Retention rates of 23 mm PIT tags with and without suture closure were 100% and 97%, respectively; retention of 32 mm PIT tags without suture closure was 69%. At the end of the experiment, tagging incisions without suture closure were generally well-healed. Fungal infection and inflammation around the incision site occurred only when suture was used, in 46% of size class I, 21% of size class II and 38% of size class III.

Short-term and long-term effects of transient exogenous cortisol manipulation on oxidative stress in juvenile brown trout

“…Fish were then tagged with a 23 mm PIT tag (RI-TRP-RRHP, 134 kHz, 0.6 g mass in air; Texas Instruments, Plano, TX, USA) inserted into their body cavity. Larsen et al (2013) demonstrated that the retention of these tags in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) was 97% with no effects on mortality rate and growth. A condition factor (K) was calculated using Eqn 1.…”

Extending the 2% rule: the effects of heavy internal tags on stress physiology, swimming performance, and growth in brook trout

“…The PIT tags weighed 0.036 g (between 0.2% and 0.5% of the dummy tag mass). In small salmonids, the impact of PIT tags has been negligible [32][33][34] therefore their weight was not included in tag burden calculations. Dummy and PIT tags were inserted in the experimental groups and the incisions of all fish were closed with two interrupted figure-eight sutures of absorbable 4-0 chromic gut.…”

Effects of tagging on migration behaviour, survival and growth of hatchery‐reared Atlantic salmon smolts

“…; Larsen et al . ). However, in the treatments with external tags and dummy transmitter, many of tag insertion areas were inflamed.…”

“…; Larsen et al . ), and PIT tagging has been used as a control treatment also in the earlier tagging studies (Hockersmith et al . ; Lacroix et al .…”