1977
DOI: 10.1086/155218
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of particle drift on cosmic-ray transport. I - General properties, application to solar modulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

12
231
0
9

Year Published

1987
1987
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 465 publications
(252 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
12
231
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…Because the sign of the helium gradient at that time was opposite to that of ACR oxygen reported here, it suggests that curvature and gradient drifts, which are field-polarity dependent, are important in the propagation of cosmic rays as suggested by Jokipii et al [1977].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 46%
“…Because the sign of the helium gradient at that time was opposite to that of ACR oxygen reported here, it suggests that curvature and gradient drifts, which are field-polarity dependent, are important in the propagation of cosmic rays as suggested by Jokipii et al [1977].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 46%
“…We suggest that the 22-year cycle in GCR flux may be partly due to direct heliospheric modulation, although drift effects (Jokipii, Levy, and Hubbard, 1977;Ferreira and Potgeiter, 2004) will still play a role, particularly during the end of the polarity cycle (i.e., the rise phase of the solar cycle), when differences in heliospheric parameters are less apparent. Of course, while changes in heliospheric structure are coincident with the differing behaviour in cosmic ray flux in alternate polarity cycles, it still remains to be shown that they are of sufficient magnitude to effect the required modulation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Therefore, we can consider the HCS as a plane with TA = 0, i.e., the heliosphere is divided into two symmetric parts (hemispheres) by the HCS coinciding with the Sun's equatorial plane. We implement in our model the drift velocities due to the large-scale curvature and gradient of the average IMF on the HCS, which are represented by the derivative of the anti-symmetric part of the anisotropic diffusion tensor (Jokipii, Levy, and Hubbard, 1977;Jokipii and Kopriva, 1979). The ratios of the perpendicular (κ ⊥ ) and drift (κ d ) diffusion coefficients to the parallel (κ ) diffusion coefficient are assumed to have the forms β = κ ⊥ /κ = (1 + ω 2 τ 2 ) −1 and β 1 = κ d /κ = ωτ (1 + ω 2 τ 2 ) −1 , where τ is the collision time and ω = qB/mc is the gyro-frequency (q and m are particle's charge and mass, respectively, and c is the speed of light).…”
Section: Model Of the 27-day Variation Of The Gcr Intensity; Results mentioning
confidence: 99%