1966
DOI: 10.2307/1378075
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Parity and Litter Size on the Birth Weight of Inbred Mice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
2
0

Year Published

1975
1975
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
2
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The smaller birth size in firstborns shown here has been observed in not only humans but also other mammals such as mice (25), sheep (26), and seals (27). However, this early growth deficit was more than compensated for such that, by 6 months, the firstborns had become heavier and taller than later borns, with a height difference of 2.6 cm persisting at 13.3 years.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…The smaller birth size in firstborns shown here has been observed in not only humans but also other mammals such as mice (25), sheep (26), and seals (27). However, this early growth deficit was more than compensated for such that, by 6 months, the firstborns had become heavier and taller than later borns, with a height difference of 2.6 cm persisting at 13.3 years.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…This advances on previous studies that generally demonstrated a genetic basis for such interactions (for example, Merilä and Fry, 1998). In addition, our study confirms the existence of a substantial main effect of litter size on weight such that average weight was inversely proportional to litter size (for example, Reading, 1966;Epstein, 1978). The effects of litter size on weight decrease over time but even at week 10 are still significant: body weight at week 10 is affected by litter size at weaning with a standardized effect of À0.19, which would cause a reduction of 2.6% of weight comparing pups with nine litter mates at weaning to those that had five litter mates.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…For example, intrauterine competition for nutrients has been known as the major reason for lower birth weight in mink kits (Schneider and Hunter, 1993). Antagonistic relationship between average birth weight and increasing litter sizes has also been demonstrated in other multiparous species such as rabbits (Castellini et al, 2010), pigs (Pardo et al, 2013), and mice (Reading, 1966;van Engelen et al, 1995). In addition, dystocia, suffocation, and crushing by the dam reduce total number of kits born alive in mink.…”
Section: Genetic Correlations Of Litter Weight Traits With Survival Rmentioning
confidence: 80%