2015
DOI: 10.1177/1524838014566718
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Parenting Programs on Child Maltreatment Prevention

Abstract: The objective of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of parenting programs in reducing child maltreatment and modifying associated factors as well as to examine the moderator variables that are linked to program effects. For this meta-analysis, we searched nine electronic databases to identify randomized controlled trials published before September 2013. The effect sizes of various outcomes at different time points were computed. From the 3,578 studies identified, we selected 37 studies for further ana… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
239
1
9

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 347 publications
(270 citation statements)
references
References 89 publications
6
239
1
9
Order By: Relevance
“…(25) A meta-analysis of education programmes was conducted to determine non-cognitive developmental benefits of parenting and early childhood education programmes, as this information was not available in existing systematic reviews. The maltreatment review updated the Lancet 2009 series article on prevention of child maltreatment (26) and a systematic review of child maltreatment prevention reviews, (27) by reviewing recent reviews of maltreatment prevention interventions (24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33)(34)(35)(36)., including home visiting, (28)(29)(30), parenting-training programmes, (31,32) sexual abuse prevention programmes, (33,34) universal campaigns to prevent physical abuse, (35) behavioural and counseling interventions,(36) detection of child maltreatment, (37) and three review studies on prevention of child maltreatment. (38)(39)(40) The social protection review examined five systematic reviews that focused on the effects of social programmes, including conditional and unconditional cash transfers and microcredit schemes.…”
Section: Panel 1: Methods and Search Strategy For Selection Of Intervmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(25) A meta-analysis of education programmes was conducted to determine non-cognitive developmental benefits of parenting and early childhood education programmes, as this information was not available in existing systematic reviews. The maltreatment review updated the Lancet 2009 series article on prevention of child maltreatment (26) and a systematic review of child maltreatment prevention reviews, (27) by reviewing recent reviews of maltreatment prevention interventions (24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33)(34)(35)(36)., including home visiting, (28)(29)(30), parenting-training programmes, (31,32) sexual abuse prevention programmes, (33,34) universal campaigns to prevent physical abuse, (35) behavioural and counseling interventions,(36) detection of child maltreatment, (37) and three review studies on prevention of child maltreatment. (38)(39)(40) The social protection review examined five systematic reviews that focused on the effects of social programmes, including conditional and unconditional cash transfers and microcredit schemes.…”
Section: Panel 1: Methods and Search Strategy For Selection Of Intervmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To account for attrition of up to 20 % within each cluster, the target sample size was set at 600 families (40 clusters with 15 families per cluster). Our estimate of expected effect size was based on the effect sizes for maltreatment and parenting outcomes in a recent review of parenting programmes for child maltreatment prevention [49]. This showed an average programme effect of 0.2, but the present study was limited by financial constraints, so will need to reach an effect of 0.36 to find significance.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Parental investment also may be associated with children’s knowledge of personal safety skills. A recent meta-analysis of parenting programs designed to reduce maltreatment found stronger effects for programs conducted in low and middle income countries ( d = .67) than for those conducted in high income countries ( d = .20) (Chen & Chan, 2016). Another study, however, found poor knowledge retention when a CSA intervention was delivered to children in a low-income urban environment (Daigneault et al, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%