2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2016.07.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of oxygen enrichment on laminar burning velocities and Markstein lengths of CH4/O2/N2 flames at elevated pressures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To further improve the accuracy of the simulated values, Figure 3b shows the deviation of uL measured by different groups from that predicted by the simulation based on GRI_mech 3.0. The results show that the difference in uL between the simulated data (0.3 MPa and 323 K) and HASSAN's [32] and Halter's [9] (0.3 MPa and 298 K) is found to be within 4.7 cm/s at a temperature difference of 25 K. Good agreement is found between our data and Cai's [33] measurements except for the Φ of 0.7, where our uL is 2.9 cm/s (error 9%) higher, as the temperature difference is 5 K. The deviation in numerical data is only slightly larger than that of Hinton's [34], especially when the equivalent is relatively high, but the maximum difference is only 5 cm/s. It can be seen that the simulation model maintains good consistency with the experimental results and literature data and can be used for analysis under certain working conditions.…”
Section: Chemical Kinetic Modelsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…To further improve the accuracy of the simulated values, Figure 3b shows the deviation of uL measured by different groups from that predicted by the simulation based on GRI_mech 3.0. The results show that the difference in uL between the simulated data (0.3 MPa and 323 K) and HASSAN's [32] and Halter's [9] (0.3 MPa and 298 K) is found to be within 4.7 cm/s at a temperature difference of 25 K. Good agreement is found between our data and Cai's [33] measurements except for the Φ of 0.7, where our uL is 2.9 cm/s (error 9%) higher, as the temperature difference is 5 K. The deviation in numerical data is only slightly larger than that of Hinton's [34], especially when the equivalent is relatively high, but the maximum difference is only 5 cm/s. It can be seen that the simulation model maintains good consistency with the experimental results and literature data and can be used for analysis under certain working conditions.…”
Section: Chemical Kinetic Modelsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…The USC 2.0 29 mechanism includes 111 substances and 784 basic chemical reactions, which contains detailed sub mechanisms such as the H 2 or CO and C 1 –C 4 dynamical models. San Diego‐Mech 30 is suitable for combustion flame under high temperature ignition and explosion conditions. The model has perfect performance in simulating small hydrocarbons with only 50 compounds and 247 elements.…”
Section: Validation Of Chemical Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Flame radiation, which will also inherently influence the extraction of unstretched flame propagation speed, is another factor that should be taken into account. Yu et al [26] proposed the following implicit expression to evaluate the effect of flame radiation…”
Section: Schlieren Photographingmentioning
confidence: 99%