2001
DOI: 10.2190/0fe0-gath-tbah-xdkc
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Overviews and Computer Experience on Learning from Hypertext

Abstract: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of overview mode and computer experience in a hypertext learning environment. College students read a hypertext unit that included a structured overview, an unstructured overview, or no overview. The study examined the effects of overview mode and computer experience on achievement, attitude and instructional time. Results indicated that participants with high computer experience learned more from the hypertext program than those with low computer experi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The lack of significant effect on the conceptual knowledge may be due to high values of standard errors. Furthermore the lack of these expected effects may be due to the fact that the non-linear document used in the present study was less extended than classical hypertexts, thus it required less relational processing between nodes (Brinkerhoff et al, 2001). Indeed the disorientation ratings were quite low (M = 3.89).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The lack of significant effect on the conceptual knowledge may be due to high values of standard errors. Furthermore the lack of these expected effects may be due to the fact that the non-linear document used in the present study was less extended than classical hypertexts, thus it required less relational processing between nodes (Brinkerhoff et al, 2001). Indeed the disorientation ratings were quite low (M = 3.89).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…A hierarchical structure may guide the reading sequence (Calisir & Gurel, 2003;de Jong & van der Hulst, 2002), support coherent reading paths (Dee-Lucas & Larkin, 1995), limit perceived disorientation (Beasley & Waugh, 1995;Last, O'Donnell, & Kelly, 2001) and improve navigation efficacy (Park & Kim, 2000). However, some studies have not found any effect of this type of structure, and authors suggest that hierarchical structures would be more helpful if the hypertext was larger containing more text sections because it would be more demanding (Brinkerhoff, Klein, & Koroghlanian 2001;Jonassen, 1993).…”
Section: Effects Of Hypertext Structures and Prior Knowledgementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This active processing effect was observed in Brinkerhoff et al (2001). They studied the effects of overview mode on attitude, post-test scores, and instructional time.…”
Section: Advance Organizersmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…So though total time spent reading the text, structure and headings was calculated, and differences noted based on their text conditions, these did not ultimately affect the participants learning and knowledge of the content. Likewise, Dee‐Lucas & Larkin (1999) find “no differences between text in node study times for the solve task” (p. 302) meaning that there wasn't a correlation between study times and task scores which was also the conclusion reached by Brinkerhoff, Klein & Koroghlanian (2001).…”
Section: What Is Learning? What Is Knowing?mentioning
confidence: 80%
“…The empirical research on hypermedia which includes hypertext and learning has demonstrated limited outcomes (Chen & Macredie, 2002; Swann, Dillon, & Fuhrman, 2001; Dillon & Gabbard, 1998). In general, satisfaction and motivation have been increased (Brinkerhoff, Klein, & Koroghlanian, 2001; Ford & Chen, 2000; Oostendorp & Nimwegen, 1998) but these do not in and of themselves address learning or knowing in a meaningful way. There remains a lack of theoretical analysis and subsequent application in the field (McKnight, Dillon, & Richardson, 1996).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%