2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2012.05.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of overt and covert attention on the steady-state visual evoked potential

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
42
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
42
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our findings in overt attention are consistent with a number of other studies [13] that SSVEP modulation is larger in overt compared to covert attention. However, one argument would be whether or not the signals obtained from gazing at the flickering stimulus can be assigned to the attention function and not response of visual cortex to the light, perse.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Our findings in overt attention are consistent with a number of other studies [13] that SSVEP modulation is larger in overt compared to covert attention. However, one argument would be whether or not the signals obtained from gazing at the flickering stimulus can be assigned to the attention function and not response of visual cortex to the light, perse.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Studies show low frequencies give higher responses as compared to high frequency stimuli, though the latter are more comfortable with subjects. Investigations done on overt and covert attention shows that SSVEP is more reliable with overt attention and covert attention amplitudes are far smaller than overt mode [39].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Recent research studies have shown that the amplitude of the response in the specific stimulus frequency varies with the different subject, colour, intensity and the type of stimulus [6,29,39]. A survey on popular devices used for creating visual stimulus such as cathode-ray-tubes (CRT), liquid crystal display (LCD), thin film transistor (TFT) display and light emitting diode (LED) based sources, identifies LED based visual stimulus as having higher bit rates when compared to other forms [45].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The commonly used EEG based BCI paradigm which has been very responsive is the steady state visual evoked potential (SSVEP), which is a repetitive sinusoidal like waveform with its frequency synchronised with the frequency of the visual stimulus and recorded from the visual cortex noninvasively [9][10][11][12][13][14]. SSVEP requires a visual stimulus to evoke the potential in the brain and the past studies have shown that the participant responses vary with different type of stimuli based on colour, frequency and intensity [14][15][16][17][18][19][20]. Even though SSVEP requires minimum number of channels and relatively less user training, it is not always comfortable for the user for prolonged usage [9,18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%