2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2019.01.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of ovarian hormones on the emission of 50-kHz ultrasonic vocalizations during distributed clitoral stimulation in the rat

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, rats were ovariectomized and treated with estradiol, progesterone, estradiol + progesterone, or a vehicle. The combined estradiol + progesterone treatment significantly increased the rate of USVs as well as the duration and complexity of the USVs [147]. This finding mirrors the previously mentioned study that found USV duration and complexity to be greatest during high hormone/receptive states.…”
Section: Adult 50 Khz Usvssupporting
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In this study, rats were ovariectomized and treated with estradiol, progesterone, estradiol + progesterone, or a vehicle. The combined estradiol + progesterone treatment significantly increased the rate of USVs as well as the duration and complexity of the USVs [147]. This finding mirrors the previously mentioned study that found USV duration and complexity to be greatest during high hormone/receptive states.…”
Section: Adult 50 Khz Usvssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Another study found that hormonal injections influenced USV acoustic parameters of trill and flat-trill 50 kHz USVs during clitoral stimulation [147]. In this study, rats were ovariectomized and treated with estradiol, progesterone, estradiol + progesterone, or a vehicle.…”
Section: Adult 50 Khz Usvsmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Like in mice, female rats emit more 50 kHz calls when sexually receptive (Thomas and Barfield, 1985 ; Matochik and Barfield, 1994 ; Bernanke et al, 2021 ; Lenell and Johnson, 2021 ) and males increase their calling rate in the presence of a receptive female (McGinnis and Vakulenko, 2003 ; Portfors, 2007 ) indicating the potential of USVs to modulate female mate choice. However, there has been controversy regarding the importance of male calls in female mate choice; while some studies support the importance of male calls (Thomas and Barfield, 1985 ; Gerson et al, 2019 ) eliciting female approach behavior (Seffer et al, 2014 ; Willadsen et al, 2014 ; Berg et al, 2018 , 2021 ; Kisko et al, 2018 , 2020 ), others found that females choose vocalizing vs. non-vocalizing males equally often (Snoeren et al, 2014 ). Despite the contradictory results, it is well accepted that female rats emit more calls when interacting with male vs. female conspecifics (White et al, 1993 ; Armas et al, 2021 ), probably signaling sexual motivation towards the male (Börner et al, 2016 ) and that male USVs can trigger female solicitation behavior (McIntosh et al, 1978 ), including ear wiggling and darting behavior.…”
Section: Contribution Of Ultrasonic Vocalizations To the Evaluation A...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our observations are consistent with the results of Barfield and Thomas (1986) , which showed estrus clustered and a modulated type of USV. Similarly, Gerson et al (2019) showed that direct clitoral stimulation elicits trill and flat-trill subtypes, and hormones significantly augment their emission. We demonstrate in Figures 7 , 9 this characteristic pattern of estrus (aroused) female vocalization with highly modulated 50-kHz signals combined in clusters.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%