2010
DOI: 10.1615/heatpipescietech.v1.i4.10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Orientation and Cuo/Water Nanofluid on the Performance of a Two-Phase Closed Thermosyphon

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This effect is known as Marangoni effect [11] Marangoni flow caused by temperature gradient and concentration gradient provides an additional mechanism for liquid return from the condenser to the evaporator other than the capillary force [12]. Alagappan et al, [13], reported that the optimum orientation range of TPCT for CUO nanofluid was 45°-50°. Kyu-II Han et al, [14], have shown that the range of the optimum inclination angle is 20°-30° for methanol and ethanol.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This effect is known as Marangoni effect [11] Marangoni flow caused by temperature gradient and concentration gradient provides an additional mechanism for liquid return from the condenser to the evaporator other than the capillary force [12]. Alagappan et al, [13], reported that the optimum orientation range of TPCT for CUO nanofluid was 45°-50°. Kyu-II Han et al, [14], have shown that the range of the optimum inclination angle is 20°-30° for methanol and ethanol.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%