“…With increasing surfactant loading level in the range studied, both CH 2 asymmetric stretching modes (ν as (CH 2 )) and symmetric stretching modes (ν s (CH 2 )) of the adsorbed surfactant slightly shift from 2929 and 2857 cm −1 (BD 0.6 ) to 2920 and 2848 cm − 1 (BD 1.2 ) for DTMA-bent, and from 2925 and 2852 cm −1 (BH 0.6 ) to 2921 and 2846 cm −1 (BH 1.2 ) for HTMA-bent, close to those of DTMA and HTMA solid (around 2918 and 2848 cm −1 , respectively), indicating that the adsorbed surfactants developed progressively from a less ordered conformation of low packing density to an ordered one of high packing density (Vaia et al, 1994;Zhu et al, 2005Zhu et al, , 2007Zhu et al, , 2008. Similar results were obtained in previous work (Jiang et al, 2015) and in good agreement with other reports (Vaia et al, 1994;Zhu et al, 2005Zhu et al, , 2007Zhu et al, , 2008. Meanwhile, the ratio between the broad peak ascribed to adsorbed hygroscopic water between 3300-3500 cm −1 to the absorption of the structural -OH sharp peak at 3630 cm − 1 of all of the organobentonites decreased compared to the raw bentonite, suggesting an increase in hydrophobicity of bentonite due to the modification (Rytwo et al, 2005).…”