Effects of organizational safety practices and perceived safety climate on PPE usage, engineering controls, and adverse events involving liquid antineoplastic drugs among nurses

Abstract

Antineoplastic drugs pose risks to the healthcare workers who handle them. This fact notwithstanding, adherence to safe handling guidelines remains inconsistent and often poor. This study examined the effects of pertinent organizational safety practices and perceived safety climate on the use of personal protective equipment, engineering controls, and adverse events (spill/leak or skin contact) involving liquid antineoplastic drugs. Data for this study came from the 2011 National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) Health and Safety Practices Survey of Healthcare Workers which included a sample of approximately 1,800 nurses who had administered liquid antineoplastic drugs during the past seven days. Regression modeling was used to examine predictors of personal protective equipment use, engineering controls, and adverse events involving antineoplastic drugs. Approximately 14% of nurses reported experiencing an adverse event while administering antineoplastic drugs during the previous week. Usage of recommended engineering controls and personal protective equipment was quite variable. Usage of both was better in non-profit and government settings, when workers were more familiar with safe handling guidelines, and when perceived management commitment to safety was higher. Usage was poorer in the absence of specific safety handling procedures. The odds of adverse events increased with number of antineoplastic drugs treatments and when antineoplastic drugs were administered more days of the week. The odds of such events were significantly lower when the use of engineering controls and personal protective equipment was greater and when more precautionary measures were in place. Greater levels of management commitment to safety and perceived risk were also related to lower odds of adverse events. These results point to the value of implementing a comprehensive health and safety program that utilizes available hazard controls and effectively communicates and demonstrates the importance of safe handling practices. Such actions also contribute to creating a positive safety climate.

Safety climate, hearing climate and hearing protection device use among transportation road maintainers

“…Consistent with research, higher general safety climate is associated with increased PPE use . Results of general safety climate and HPD use specifically have been mixed.…”

“…Safety climate has been positively linked to safety outcomes as well as safety behaviors such as increased PPE use . Associations have been observed between higher general safety climate and increased PPE use, although few have examined HPD use specifically …”

Predictors of Chemotherapy Safe-Handling Precautions and Knowledge Among a Sample of Jordanian Oncology Nurses: A Model-Building Approach

“…Different routes of contamination have been identified, including food, as well hand-to-mouth and dermal contact (Polovich & Clark, 2012). Occupational exposures to chemotherapeutic agents has been associated with health complications and serious illnesses among workers including dermatitis, abortion, fetal loss, chromosomal abnormalities, deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) damage, and infertility (DeJoy et al, 2017; Lawson et al, 2013; Polovich & Clark, 2012).…”

Cytostatic and cytotoxic waste – rules of conduct in Poland

“…Dla personelu medycznego, który w środowisku pracy ma kontakt z cytostatykami, mogą one stanowić poważne zagrożenie dla zdrowia [32]. Problem ekspozycji personelu aptek szpitalnych oraz oddziałów szpitalnych spowodował konieczność opracowania zasad przygotowania i podawania leków przeciwnowotworowych [33,34]. Standardy jakości w farmacji onkologicznej wytyczyły procedury postępowania z lekami niebezpiecznymi w aptece szpitalnej: od przyjęcia dostawy leków przez przygotowanie, podawanie aż po utylizację [35,36].…”