1997
DOI: 10.1890/1051-0761(1997)007[0543:eooads]2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Organismal and Distance Scaling on Analysis of Species Distribution and Abundance

Abstract: As communities and populations become increasingly fragmented, much theoretical and some empirical research has focused on the dynamics of metapopulations. Many metapopulation models describe dynamics among populations in a region, yet the scale of the region to which different models apply often is undefined. Because the spatial scale is undefined, testing predictions and assumptions of these models is problematic. Our goal is to present two scaling concepts relevant to these models, distance scaling and orga… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
57
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 110 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
8
57
1
Order By: Relevance
“…(3) The larger the number of sample sites, the greater the proportion of satellite species and the smaller the proportion of core species (Williams 1950(Williams , 1964. This phenomenon has also been termed ''distance scaling'' by Collins and Glenn (1997) and was first demonstrated by Williams (1950Williams ( , 1964. (4) The presence or absence of bimodality is sensitive to the spatial scale of observation (Williams 1964, Brown 1984.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…(3) The larger the number of sample sites, the greater the proportion of satellite species and the smaller the proportion of core species (Williams 1950(Williams , 1964. This phenomenon has also been termed ''distance scaling'' by Collins and Glenn (1997) and was first demonstrated by Williams (1950Williams ( , 1964. (4) The presence or absence of bimodality is sensitive to the spatial scale of observation (Williams 1964, Brown 1984.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Most exclosures are subjectively located near roads and in flat terrain. Local species richness, for example, may be poorly correlated with landscapescale species richness, because species overlap and species richness are highly dependent on scale (e.g., Collins and Glenn 1997, Stohlgren et al 1997a, 1999. None of the studies that we reviewed detailed the sample population (i.e., all potential sites from which the exclosure sites were selected).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One reason that we are resistant to employing a metapopulation or refuge model is that although the assumptions and conditions of the model may hold for some species, they may not hold for all species (see Collins and Glenn 1997). We suspect that because of the extremely heterogeneous nature of the scrub habitat (see Myers 1990), many scrub vertebrates have dealt successfully with habitat fragmentation throughout much of their evolutionary histories (see Jackson 1973, Campbell andChristman 1982), and can, on the one hand, resist extinction at what seem to the observer to be very low population sizes and, on the other hand, disperse between habitat fragments that seem to the observer to be isolated from each other (see Harrison 1989Harrison , 1991.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%