Effects of Organic or Inorganic Acid Supplementation on Growth Performance, Nutrient Digestibility and White Blood Cell Counts in Weanling Pigs

Abstract

Four experiments were conducted to investigate the effect of organic or inorganic acid supplementation on the growth performance, nutrient digestibility, intestinal measurements and white blood cell counts of weanling pigs. In growth trial (Exp I), a total of 100 crossbred pigs ({Landrace×Yorkshire}×Duroc), weaned at 23±2 days of age and 7.25±0.10 kg average initial body weight (BW), were allotted to 5 treatments by body weight and sex in a randomized complete block (RCB) design. Three different organic acids (fumaric [FUA], formic [FOA] or lactic acid [LAA]) and one inorganic acid (hydrochloric acid [SHA]) were supplemented to each treatment diet. Each treatment had 5 replicates with 4 pigs per pen. During 0-3 wk, average daily gain (ADG), average daily feed intake (ADFI) and feed efficiency (G/F ratio) were not significantly different among treatments. However, pigs fed LAA or SHA diet showed improved ADG by 15 or 13% respectively and 12% greater ADFI in both treatments compared to CON diets. Moreover, compared to organic acid treatments, better ADG (p = 0.07) and ADFI (p = 0.09) were observed in SHA diet compared to pigs that were fed the diet containing organic acids (FUA, FOA or LAA). However, during 4-5 wk, no differences in ADG, ADFI and G/F ratio were observed among treatments. Overall, ADG, ADFI and G/F ratio were not affected by acidifier supplementation. Although it showed no significant difference, pigs fed LAA or SHA diets showed numerically higher ADG and ADFI than pigs fed other treatments. In metabolic trial (Exp II), 15 pigs were used to evaluate the effect of acidifier supplementation on nutrient digestibility. The digestibility of dry matter (DM), crude protein (CP), crude fat (CF), crude ash (CA), calcium (Ca) and phosphorus (P) was not improved by acidifier supplementation. Although the amount of fecal-N excretion was not different among treatments, that of urinary-N excretion was reduced in acidsupplemented treatments compared to CON group (p = 0.12). Subsequently, N retention was improved in acid-supplemented groups (p = 0.17). In anatomical trial (Exp III), the pH and Clconcentrations of digesta in gastrointestinal (GI) tracts were not affected by acidifier supplementation. No detrimental effect of intestinal and lingual (taste bud) morphology was observed by acidifier supplementation particularly in inorganic acid treatment. In white blood cell assay (Exp IV), 45 pigs were used for measuring white blood cell (WBC) counts. In all pigs after LPS injection, WBC counts had slightly declined at 2 h and kept elevating at 8 h, then returned to baseline by 24 h after injection of lipopolysaccharide (LPS). However, overall WBC counts were not affected by acidifier supplementation. In conclusion, there was no difference between organic and inorganic acidifier supplementation in weanling pigs' diet, however inorganic acidifier might have a beneficial effect on growth performance and N utilization with lower supplementation levels. Furthermore, inorganic acidifier had no negative effect on intestina...

Effect of protected organic acid blends on growth performance, nutrient digestibility and faecal micro flora in growing pigs

“…In the present study DM, nitrogen and energy digestibility were not affected with organic acid supplements which are consistent with the findings of Kil et al (2006) and Radecki et al (1988) who indicated that DM and CP were not improved by organic acid such as formic, fumaric or lactic acid. In contrast, other researcher observed favourable effect on nutrient digestibility with organic acid supplementation such as 2% benzoic acid in the diet of lactating sows (Kluge et al 2010).…”

Influence of protected organic acid blends and diets with different nutrient densities on growth performance, nutrient digestibility and faecal noxious gas emission in growing pigs

“…This may reduce the total quantity of faecal protein and hence increase the digestibility of nitrogen and also of DM and E, as an indirect consequence. However, in the present study, nitrogen and energy digestibility were apparently not improved by organic acid supplementation, consistent with the findings of Kil et al (2006) and Radecki et al (1988), who reported that DM and CP were not improved by the addition of organic acids such as formic, fumaric, or lactic acid. In contrast, other researchers have observed favourable effects on nutrient digestibility with organic acid supplementation (Franco et al 2005).…”

Protected Organic Acids Improved Growth Performance, Nutrient Digestibility, and Decreased Gas Emission in Broilers

“…However, the N and energy digestibility in this study were not improved by the blend of OA and MCFA supplementation. In contrast, other studies reported that the DM digestibility was not affected with dietary supplementation of the same product in laying hens [20], organic acids such as formic, fumaric, or lactic acid in pigs [42,43]. Moreover, it was found that the metabolizable coefficients of gross energy and N had increased in broilers fed OAs [40,44] compared to those fed diets without OAs.…”