2000
DOI: 10.1139/cjfr-30-10-1511
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of ontogeny and soil nutrient supply on production, allocation, and leaf area efficiency in loblolly and slash pine stands

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
28
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
5
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From age seven onward, RUE averaged 0.24 6 0.02 g C/MJ. Similar patterns of NPP have been reported for other pine plantations in the southeastern United States (Swindel et al 1988, Colbert et al 1990, Jokela and Martin 2000, Adegbidi et al 2002, Burkes et al 2003, Samuelson et al 2004. In the more intensive management cases, stands reached an average maximum of 10.92 Mg CÁha À1 Áyr À1 between the ages of 6-9 years.…”
Section: Interannual Variability After Canopy Closuresupporting
confidence: 73%
“…From age seven onward, RUE averaged 0.24 6 0.02 g C/MJ. Similar patterns of NPP have been reported for other pine plantations in the southeastern United States (Swindel et al 1988, Colbert et al 1990, Jokela and Martin 2000, Adegbidi et al 2002, Burkes et al 2003, Samuelson et al 2004. In the more intensive management cases, stands reached an average maximum of 10.92 Mg CÁha À1 Áyr À1 between the ages of 6-9 years.…”
Section: Interannual Variability After Canopy Closuresupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Foliar nitrogen concentration measured seven times during 1999 and 2000 on two foliage cohorts of Pinus taeda for stands growing at a Piedmont (BF Grant) and Coastal Plain (Waycross) location in southeast Georgia, U.S.A. This correlation between leaf area or leaf biomass and stem growth is a universal finding for loblolly pine (Zutter et al 1986;Vose and Allen 1988;Britt et al 1990;Colbert et al 1990;Green et al 1991;Albaugh et al 1998;Jokela and Martin 2000;Samuelson et al 2000). Each point represents the average value of six plots (three stand ages × two sites).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…After the forest has reached maturity NPP is scaled down from peak levels to mimic observed declines in NPP in mature forests [e.g., Gower et al , 1997]. Allocation of NPP to wood is prescribed to increase with time after disturbance since initially most NPP is allocated to herbaceous growth with more going to wood as the stand ages [e.g., Law et al , 2002; Jokela and Martin , 2000]. The disturbance event causes the living biomass pools (leaves, roots, wood) to dramatically decrease (depending on the type and level of disturbance).…”
Section: Analysis Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%