“…Associated with this is the second challenge facing human appetitive conditioning research, namely, the lack of an established gold standard measurement to assess conditioned responding. A frequently implemented method to confirm successful conditioning are ratings, for example, CS valence Ebrahimi et al, 2017Ebrahimi et al, , 2019Klucken et al, 2015Klucken et al, , 2009Klucken et al, , 2013Klucken et al, , 2016Prévost et al, 2013), CS dichotomous preference (Bray & O'Doherty, 2007;Kahnt, Heinzle, Park, & Haynes, 2011;Metereau & Dreher, 2013;Prévost et al, 2013), US expectancy (van den Akker, Havermans, & Jansen, 2015), and contingency awareness (Bray & O'Doherty, 2007;Ebrahimi et al, 2017Ebrahimi et al, , 2019Klucken et al, 2015Klucken et al, , 2009Klucken et al, , 2013Klucken et al, , 2016Stussi et al, 2018;Tapia León et al, 2018). A shortcoming of ratings is that they only reflect the explicit component of learning and are prone to influences of social desirability when the learning task is simple.…”