2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2015.02.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of occasional reinforced trials during extinction on the reacquisition of conditioned responses to food cues

Abstract: It is concluded that the provision of occasional reinforced extinction trials and unpaired USs seem promising techniques to slow down reacquisition, but that additional studies are needed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
36
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
(73 reference statements)
1
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a treatment, CERP also reduces self-reported craving (178) and binge eating in individuals with bulimia nervosa (178,180,184,185). However, extinction of cueresponse pairings can be context-specific and may therefore still be reinstated in new environments (100, [186][187][188][189] or through incubation of craving (190), even after extinction, limiting the potential application of CERP. Consistently, clinical trials for CERP have been mixed for other eating disorders (191), obesity (192) and addictions (193,194).…”
Section: Treatment Implications For Obesity and Related Disordersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a treatment, CERP also reduces self-reported craving (178) and binge eating in individuals with bulimia nervosa (178,180,184,185). However, extinction of cueresponse pairings can be context-specific and may therefore still be reinstated in new environments (100, [186][187][188][189] or through incubation of craving (190), even after extinction, limiting the potential application of CERP. Consistently, clinical trials for CERP have been mixed for other eating disorders (191), obesity (192) and addictions (193,194).…”
Section: Treatment Implications For Obesity and Related Disordersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In humans, it likewise appears to be relatively easy to learn cued eating desires by means of classical conditioning procedures ( Van Gucht et al, 2008 ; Papachristou et al, 2013 ; Van den Akker et al, 2013 , 2014 , 2015 ; Bongers and Jansen, 2015 ; Bongers et al, 2015 ). After the learning of a stimulus predicting intake, the mere presence of the food-predictive stimulus is sufficient to elicit eating expectations and desires.…”
Section: Acquisition Of Food Cravingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Associated with this is the second challenge facing human appetitive conditioning research, namely, the lack of an established gold standard measurement to assess conditioned responding. A frequently implemented method to confirm successful conditioning are ratings, for example, CS valence Ebrahimi et al, 2017Ebrahimi et al, , 2019Klucken et al, 2015Klucken et al, , 2009Klucken et al, , 2013Klucken et al, , 2016Prévost et al, 2013), CS dichotomous preference (Bray & O'Doherty, 2007;Kahnt, Heinzle, Park, & Haynes, 2011;Metereau & Dreher, 2013;Prévost et al, 2013), US expectancy (van den Akker, Havermans, & Jansen, 2015), and contingency awareness (Bray & O'Doherty, 2007;Ebrahimi et al, 2017Ebrahimi et al, , 2019Klucken et al, 2015Klucken et al, , 2009Klucken et al, , 2013Klucken et al, , 2016Stussi et al, 2018;Tapia León et al, 2018). A shortcoming of ratings is that they only reflect the explicit component of learning and are prone to influences of social desirability when the learning task is simple.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%