1981
DOI: 10.1530/jrf.0.0630347
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of obstruction of the flow of seminiferous tubule fluid on the germinal epithelium in the rat

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, by that time, the Cr-EDTA space has fallen again to well below the interstitial tissue volume, suggesting that the barrier has been re-established. The interpretation of these findings is complicated by the observation that the introduction of a plug of non-toxic latex into a single seminiferous tubule produces a very similar lesion to that seen after efferent duct ligation (Pilsworth et al 1981). It is hard to see how the tubular barrier would be affected by a blockage in the lumen, so perhaps the flow of fluid along the tubule is also important for normal spermatogenesis, and the normal flow of luminal fluid would probably be severely disrupted after efferent duct ligation.…”
Section: The Tubular Barriermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, by that time, the Cr-EDTA space has fallen again to well below the interstitial tissue volume, suggesting that the barrier has been re-established. The interpretation of these findings is complicated by the observation that the introduction of a plug of non-toxic latex into a single seminiferous tubule produces a very similar lesion to that seen after efferent duct ligation (Pilsworth et al 1981). It is hard to see how the tubular barrier would be affected by a blockage in the lumen, so perhaps the flow of fluid along the tubule is also important for normal spermatogenesis, and the normal flow of luminal fluid would probably be severely disrupted after efferent duct ligation.…”
Section: The Tubular Barriermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Efferent duct ligation has been performed to collect rete testis fluid (Cooper and Waites, 1974;Shabanowitz and Killian, 1987) and to study the effects of depriving the tract downstream of sperm and testicular factors (Abe et al, 1982a;Nicander et al, 1983;Delongeas et al, 1987). Ligation of the efferent ducts causes rapid and extensive degeneration of the seminiferous epithelium, with loss of most or all germ cells and cessation of sperm production (Harrison, 1953;Collins and Tsang, 1979;Pilsworth et al, 1981). The responses of the testis to vasectomy are varied, although testicular alterations have been reported in most species studied, including humans (Bedford, 1976;Flickinger, 1985;Jarow et al, 1985Jarow et al, , 1994.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Effects on the testis of epididymal obstruction in adults (usually unilateral) have varied, with some authors reporting substantial testicular damage (Harrison and Macmillan, 1954;Vare and Bansal, 1974), while others have observed that deleterious changes are followed by recovery (Baillie, 1962;Paufler and Foote, 1969). Among the possible mechanisms of testicular damage after epididymal obstruction are increased pressure in the seminiferous tubules (Vare and Bansal, 1974;Paufler and Foote, 1969), accumulation of metabolites (Pilsworth et al, 1981), and absence of substances secreted by the epididymis (Paufler and Foote, 1969;Soler et al, 1990). However, since antisperm autoantibodies rise after epididymal obstruction (Flickinger et al, 1998), an autoimmune reaction may also cause testicular changes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown by Tung & Fritz (1978), immunization against pachytene spermatocytes results in severe testicular damage. Pilsworth, Hinton & Setchell (1981) reported that disruption of the flow of seminiferous tubule fluid caused damage even at a considerable distance from the site of obstruction. Removal of a biopsy will necessarily disrupt a number of tubules, and hence it seems probable that some of the lesions found in the present study were caused by such mechanisms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%