2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.bspc.2021.102530
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of objects and image quality on melanoma classification using deep neural networks

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(36 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, we propose -and have provided empirical justification -that image quality threshold should be treated as a tunable hyperparameter. There is ample demonstration of the detrimental effect of synthetic image degradation on the performance of DL models trained on 'clean' datasets [1,9,15,7,20,4]. In line with this, natural sources of image degradation have also been shown to reduce the performance of a DL model trained exclusively on high-quality retinal images [22].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…In particular, we propose -and have provided empirical justification -that image quality threshold should be treated as a tunable hyperparameter. There is ample demonstration of the detrimental effect of synthetic image degradation on the performance of DL models trained on 'clean' datasets [1,9,15,7,20,4]. In line with this, natural sources of image degradation have also been shown to reduce the performance of a DL model trained exclusively on high-quality retinal images [22].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Here, accuracy defines the system performance examination based on the correct estimation values relevant to the total estimation number. Specificity defines the As mentioned before, the suggested melanoma diagnosis system has been implemented on SIIM-ISIC Melanoma dataset and its achievements were put in comparison with several newest techniques that are Deep neural network (DNN), 37 morphology, 38 Roi-based, 39 oversampling, 40 gray level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM), 41 color and texture features, 42 and superpixels. 43 Table 3 indicates the comparison analysis of the suggested technique with the other state-of--of-the--the-art methods.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, evaluation of the performance of the proposed hybrid strategy with a larger number of subjects may ultimately lead to the development of an algorithm for automated cancer identification and screening with the use of deep learning and machine learning methods. Regarding our future plans, further development of the method is warranted including application of an AI approach for the development of automated tissue classification methods which can later be applied to the assessment of tumor margins based on the hyperspectral imaging concept presented here [20, 32, 44–49]. One way to improve our screening performance is to separately obtain the scattering coefficient from the absorption coefficient by utilizing the approach described in ref.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%